Will Gasquet become more successful than Djokovic and Murray

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by NadalForever, Jul 11, 2007.

  1. NadalForever

    NadalForever Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2007
    Messages:
    196
    I think Gasquet has way more talent than either Djokovic or Murray. He has already made a strong statement at this year's Wimbledon. Will he be more sucessful than both of them? I think he will. What do you guys think.
     
    #1
  2. anointedone

    anointedone Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,655
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    I dont think it is obvious which one of the 3 will be the best. I think Gasquet is the most talented, but that is not a gaurantee he will be the best. I think Djokovic is the one most willing to try to find every way to improve his game and abilities anyway possible, even by the smallest margin in something. Murray is an intriguing talent, but the evaluation of his maturation now is stalled by injury. He has to get over his mental block of playing Djokovic too.
     
    #2
  3. J-man

    J-man Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,053
    He may have more talent then Murray or Novak D but that doesn't exctly traslate to being more sucessful. He has a great game but lots of links in the chain. He will need to fix them to become better.

    I wouldn't be surprised if he does better than Murray in the long run but Dojkovic is a differnet story. He has much more firepower than Gasquet.
     
    #3
  4. Michelangelo

    Michelangelo Professional

    Joined:
    May 27, 2005
    Messages:
    879
    Agree. No surprise if it ends up with a blown gasket... I mean Gasquet.
     
    #4
  5. DariusRaiden

    DariusRaiden Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2004
    Messages:
    230
    I agree with the above posters that he is the most talented, but that having the most talent doesn't necessarily equate to having the most success (see Safin, Malisse, Stich, Rios, etc).

    For me, the X factor is Gasquet's all-court, all-surface game. He grew up on clay but has proven his best surface is grass, so he can play on anything. He has had excellent results in Masters Series events on various surfaces, which is something that Murray hasn't yet (really only excels on hardcourts).

    Gasquet probably has the least firepower of all the young players, including Djokovic, Nadal, Berdych, and Baghdatis in addition to Murray. However, he has the most varied arsenal, particularly when you look at his touch and his ability to volley. His movement is also underrated and is very smooth, quite similar in fact to someone like Pete Sampras or Roger Federer. All-in-all, he is very difficult to attack because he has heavy shots and is very intelligent with his use of angles and his ability to play from the front and the back of the court.

    Only time will tell, but I think that he clearly has the most raw talent and flair. If he can put it together consistently, he will be scary, and I think his huge comeback win against Roddick will really get his confidence going. ALLES RICHARD!
     
    #5
  6. fastdunn

    fastdunn Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,294
    yes, if he loses his cap worn backward.
     
    #6
  7. NadalForever

    NadalForever Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2007
    Messages:
    196
    I doubt whether Djokovic is really this good. Why did he need over four hours to beat out of shape Hewitt and 5 hours to beat a mediocre player like Bagdattis. Gasqeut got to the semifinal of Wimbledon much easier than Djokovic. And Gasquet has actually beaten Federer while only 18 years old whereas Djokovic is 0-4 against Federer. My prediction is that Gasquet will win 5 slams in his career. Djokovic will win 3 and Andy Murray will win 2.
     
    #7
  8. anointedone

    anointedone Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,655
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    I would predict 3 for Gasquet, 3 for Djokovic, 1 for Murray, and definitely 0 for Berdych and Baghdatis.
     
    #8
  9. Kaptain Karl

    Kaptain Karl Hall Of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2004
    Messages:
    5,236
    Location:
    The High Country of Colorado
    Yup. What he said.

    Murray is a head case. I can't figure out whether or not Berdych is, too. Gasquet, Djoker and Baghy are looking better and better, and Djoker has a "bullet" these last few months. We'll see....

    - KK
     
    #9
  10. anointedone

    anointedone Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,655
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    What about Monfils? Is he in the conversation, or is he proving to be a bust given the expectations for him out of juniors. I remember at the U.S Open two years ago when he played Djokovic in the first round. Djokovic is a bit younger then Monfils, and was leading the match slightly, yet the commentators, one who was Courier, just kept talking about how incredible a talent and future prospect Monfils was. How athletic and powerful he was, how talented he was, etc....The fact that Djokovic is a bit younger, and was leading the match, and was outhitting Monfils on alot of the points, seemingly meant nothing to them.

    They only gave subtle recognition to Djokovic as a strong talent or future star. Like Courier noting casualy, "Djokovic as you see his bio, is also a young guy, who is pretty talented as well." Djokovic won a 5 setter in controversial fashion that day, with some fake cramping displays to buy more time, which he admited afterwords.

    It is funny to see the two now two years later. Djokovic is on another planet from Monfils at the moment.
     
    #10
  11. NadalForever

    NadalForever Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2007
    Messages:
    196
    Results is all that matters and Monfils has not produced anything significant.
     
    #11
  12. NamRanger

    NamRanger G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    13,916
    Djokovic has shown he can hang with the top 2 players in the world, Federer and Nadal. Even though he does lose the majority of the matches, it's not like he gets blown away like most people.



    Gasquet is hard to tell, there are days where he's on, and others where he isn't. He hasen't figured out how to utilize all of his weapons yet.
     
    #12
  13. Alexandros

    Alexandros Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,400
    Murray brings more firepower onto the court than Gasquet, but I would say it is more Gasquet's choice than a lack of it. He's not a Hewitt who tries to generate more pace but simply cannot, his current playing style is usually rallying from the back of the court with heavy spin and occasionally cranking out a hard and flat shot when going for winners.

    If he could be brought out of his shell to be more aggressive he has the power to execute a more dictating style of play.
     
    #13
  14. FEDEXP

    FEDEXP Professional

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,110
    I would just hope that both Djokovich and Gasquet become major contenders.
     
    #14
  15. Kaptain Karl

    Kaptain Karl Hall Of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2004
    Messages:
    5,236
    Location:
    The High Country of Colorado
    I suspect you didn't mean "funny" to signify "humorous", but ironic.... As a HS Coach I can attest to how much predicting a kid's success is really "crystal balling."

    A year ago I would not have picked Djoker to have risen so much in the rankings. I'd have chosen Baghy or maybe Berdych. (Probably why I'm still coaching high school, huh...?)

    - KK
     
    #15
  16. AAAA

    AAAA Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    3,389
    Never seen "bullet" used in this way before. Killer Instinct?
     
    #16
  17. Kaptain Karl

    Kaptain Karl Hall Of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2004
    Messages:
    5,236
    Location:
    The High Country of Colorado
    When a song is rising fast on the Music Charts, it's said to (for instance) be "at #13 with a bullet."

    - KK
     
    #17
  18. BkK_b0y14

    BkK_b0y14 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2007
    Messages:
    659
    actually he loses more without his hat...

    they are actually good friends, like at the Estoril Open
     
    #18
  19. helloworld

    helloworld Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,670
    Gasquet used to be as good as Nadal in Juniors though. I believe he was slightly better as well, but somehow Nadal suddenly became a lot more successful in the pros tour.
     
    #19
  20. ATPattic

    ATPattic New User

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2007
    Messages:
    90
    exactly!!!
     
    #20
  21. kaiotic

    kaiotic Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2005
    Messages:
    269
    agreed. and mo consistency
     
    #21
  22. TENNIS_99

    TENNIS_99 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2005
    Messages:
    440
    There is something missing in Gasquet that Dojkovic has - the confidence to be #1. The problem for Dojkovic his his physical condition. He is not very physically tough witnessed by this year's Wimbledon and incidents with Federer earlier. But I think Gasquet has tougher way than Dojkovic. As for Murray, like his games, but shortfall in both physical and mental. Still root for the Scots everytime he's on court though.
     
    #22
  23. MaxT

    MaxT Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2006
    Messages:
    341
    Don't forget Nodal is about the same age, so even the best of the three may have to play second string for the whole career in the post-Fed era.
     
    #23
  24. dave333

    dave333 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2006
    Messages:
    2,018
    Because Nadal got jacked and Murray didn't :)
     
    #24
  25. david22

    david22 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    365
    oki for Berdych and perhaps Baghdatis but less firepower than Nadal,Djokovic or Murray??? come on!
     
    #25
  26. david22

    david22 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    365
    Monfils doesn t even deserve to be mentionned in the same league as youngsters like Gasquet,Djokovic or Murray.
     
    #26
  27. erdega79

    erdega79 New User

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    47
    1.Djokovic
































    2.Murray/Gasquet
     
    #27
  28. p0w3r

    p0w3r Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2006
    Messages:
    513
    Location:
    New York City
    it has to do with his overwhelming advantage his style of play has on the clay court season...he is almost impossible to beat except for what? one loss to the great fed? this gives him tons of victories and points...especially one grand slam.

    gasquet does not have this advantage...he is good on all surfaces, but better on faster ones. yet still its not enough to have the huge advantage like nadal does. I really hope he gets there though, i really like how he plays...kinda reminds me of fed with a flashier backhand.
     
    #28
  29. Wawa

    Wawa New User

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    Messages:
    52
    Location:
    Cyprus
    i can't believe Gasquet is going to became better than Novak or Andy.
    He had never won in a 5set match except the one with Roddick in Wimbeldon07
     
    #29
  30. Tennisace1

    Tennisace1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2007
    Messages:
    166
    djokovic in my opinion will have alot of success early. Hes got the all court game, and very talented. Murray got more of the strategy and mental game as the two. Gasquet has alot of talent to. I do believe his weakness is mental, but i think once he gets good results consistantly, he would be more confident. Murray has only excelled in hardcourts, but hes got the game for all surfaces. So do all the player listed above.
     
    #30
  31. Wawa

    Wawa New User

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    Messages:
    52
    Location:
    Cyprus
    I don't believe that Gasquet is so talented and my thought is that talented tennis players are not so good as Baghdatis, Novak and Nadal.
     
    #31
  32. Hops

    Hops Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2005
    Messages:
    392

    not true. his five set record is 4-6.
     
    #32
  33. david22

    david22 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    365
    and the one against Ljubicic??
     
    #33
  34. fastdunn

    fastdunn Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,294
    Hahaha.

    What I actually meant is "if he loses his junior metality...".
     
    #34
  35. laurie

    laurie Guest

    I want to see Gasquet becomming the best player in the world in the next 2 years.

    Whether that happens of course is another matter.
     
    #35
  36. Cindysphinx

    Cindysphinx G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Messages:
    15,070
    Djokovic isn't an all-court player. Doesn't transition to net. Doesn't have half of Nadal's (newly-displayed) finesse.

    Gasquet has it all. Just needs more confidence.

    If you can't give props to Gasquet for whipping Roddick, then I just don't know what to say.
     
    #36
  37. Eviscerator

    Eviscerator Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,709
    Location:
    S. Florida
    Djokovic

    Gasquet

    Murray

    I see them in that order, but they are close enough (esp. Djokovic/Gasquet) to wind up differently.
     
    #37

Share This Page