Will Nadal tie or beat Federer's GS's

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by kobe3pointer, Jun 7, 2009.

?

Will Nadal tie or beat Federer's GS's

  1. Yes

    8 vote(s)
    9.4%
  2. No

    77 vote(s)
    90.6%
  1. kobe3pointer

    kobe3pointer Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 11, 2008
    Messages:
    445
    I was just wondering, after Federer retires, Nadal has a chance to take them all(some would argue that even with Fed he does) But I think it would take the pressure off him.

    He is only 23 years old. He has a great chance.

    What do you think?
     
    #1
  2. R_Federer

    R_Federer Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2009
    Messages:
    906
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    Ill say it for the 50th time. For Nadal its NOT about age. I always hear "he is only 21" etc. but its the way he has played his tennis. He has worked hard for every point and eventually he will break down. We are already seeing signs of it. Perhaps he'll win 2 more hard/grass combined Slams and 2-3 more French. That gets him ~11. So no.
     
    #2
  3. Docalex007

    Docalex007 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,660
    Location:
    London/Berlin
    Actually come to think of it... Nadal's getting kinda old. :shock:

    It just kinda crept up on me... last thing I heard he was 21.
     
    #3
  4. kobe3pointer

    kobe3pointer Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 11, 2008
    Messages:
    445
    For a second there I almost thought YOU were Roger... :D
     
    #4
  5. <3tennis!!!

    <3tennis!!! Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2009
    Messages:
    476
    absolutely no chance whatsoever
     
    #5
  6. kobe3pointer

    kobe3pointer Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 11, 2008
    Messages:
    445
    Wow, didnt realize it was soo hard(because everything has to go right)... dang Federer... :D
     
    #6
  7. BigServer1

    BigServer1 Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2006
    Messages:
    5,035
    Location:
    Scottsdale, AZ
    It's not about age, it's about mileage, and Nadal has put a LOT of miles on his body since 2004. The guy has been winning tournaments and slams since he was 18 years old, and his style of play is incredibly taxing when compared with a guy like Sampras or Federer.

    Unfortunately, I'll be really surprised if Nadal is a serious contender for Slams after the age of 25. I hope he proves me wrong and is able to play at a high level for a long time, but with the chronic (yes, they're chronic) injuries that he's dealt with since 2006, I don't see him making it past 9-10 slams. With that said, he'll be a clay GOAT, and one of only three open era men to win the FO-Wimby back-to-back. That, combined with Slams on three surfaces, multiple wins over Fed, a ton of MS shields, 4 FOs in a row and an Olympic singles gold medal should get him into the top 6-8 of GOAT candidates. His status would be much higher if he manages to win a US Open.

    Hopefully he'll be around, but I just don't see it happening.
     
    #7
  8. R_Federer

    R_Federer Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2009
    Messages:
    906
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    ^ Good points BigServer, though Federer has a great chance to join Nadal and the two others to win the FO-Wimby back-to-back :D.

    Wow the poll is 0 to 12. Never knew it would be that lopsided.
     
    #8
  9. BigServer1

    BigServer1 Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2006
    Messages:
    5,035
    Location:
    Scottsdale, AZ
    No, I know, and man, do I ever hope that it happens. Another thing that will make it hard for Nadal is the fact that Federer should end up with a minimum of 15-16 slams, so Nadal will have to win 9-10 more just to tie...It's a tough task considering what he's already going through physically.
     
    #9
  10. NamRanger

    NamRanger G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    13,916
    I'll be surprised if he even manages to hold onto the #1 spot this year let alone continue to win slams (outside of the FO).
     
    #10
  11. bruce38

    bruce38 Banned

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    1,850
    I think that's also because Fed is no where close to being done yet.
     
    #11
  12. lawrence

    lawrence Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,878
    we're all getting old
    time just flies by these days :(
     
    #12
  13. the Artist

    the Artist Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2008
    Messages:
    105
    I can't imagine Nadal triumphing in 14 slams.

    I can however foresee Fed adding to 14.
     
    #13
  14. thalivest

    thalivest Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2007
    Messages:
    4,486
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    Sadly no. I would be thrilled if he somehow wins another 2-3 Frenchs to tie/break the record, and wins a U.S Open somehow to complete the career slam. I will be pleasently surprised if Rafa wins any slams past 2012 so he needs to completely dominate the next 3.5 years to even surpass the 14 of Pete (and Roger will be beyond that).
     
    #14
  15. OTMPut

    OTMPut Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,285
    He has perhaps 1 or 2 more RG in him.
    Guys are adapting fast. He is declining physically. Fed is going to be around in good form for another 3-4 years.
    No chance outside RG, really.
     
    #15
  16. thalivest

    thalivest Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2007
    Messages:
    4,486
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    I think people are too quick to write Rafa off. He still is a huge contender at any of the Australian, French, or Wimbledon for the next few years. His best shot at the U.S Open may have been last year though. I still have faith he could surprise and pull it off though.
     
    #16
  17. joeri888

    joeri888 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    13,123
    I thought he might before this tournament, cause I'd expect us to be at 13-7 now instead of 14-6. It's a huge gap and since I think Fed might win another one this year, Rafa is still not gaining in Slams at roger, while Roger is obviously quite past his prime. Not dissing Rafa here, Roger is just amazing at Slams though. Rafa will double (or at least win a lot more) Fed's master series titles.
     
    #17
  18. roysid

    roysid Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,387
    I think Fed will end up with 16-18 slams. Nadal 10-12 slams.

    For Nadal to overtake Federer, the next 6 slams he has to play unbelievably taking out 4-5 of them. After 2010, it will be very tough for either fed or nadal to win slams.
     
    #18
  19. jamesblakefan#1

    jamesblakefan#1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2007
    Messages:
    15,707
    Location:
    VA Beach
    38 to 4. That's a pretty decisive no. Something everyone agrees on yay!
     
    #19
  20. flying24

    flying24 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,924
    No way Nadal wins any slams past 2012. For all we know now he may not win any slams past 2010. I am not a Nadal hater but with his playing style and the fact he is already breaking down that seems obvious. He has already lasted longer than many predicted him to. I do like the guy, and while I am a Federer fan I also hope Nadal adds as much as he can to his current achievements in the next 18 to 40 months as I think he is worthy of more achievements than he already has. He still has some window left but it wont be open as long as his staunchest fans would like to think.
     
    Last edited: Jun 8, 2009
    #20
  21. theduh

    theduh Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    Messages:
    768
    Location:
    Middle earth
    If Nadal doesn't change his playing style I would have to say a big fat NO.
     
    #21
  22. sh@de

    sh@de Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,979
    I say no given Nadal's current knees. But you never know, there might be a miracle and he gets surgery or some random stuff and miraculously heals and then goes on to win the next 20 slams or sth...

    I'd say Nadal has a chance, but a slim one. Winning so many slams is difficult.
     
    #22
  23. tata

    tata Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,065
    Pointless thread. Discuss this when federer retires. He's on 14 AND COUNTING
     
    #23
  24. defrule

    defrule Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Messages:
    823
    He needs to becareful with his health. Possibly do what Federer does peak at the slams, Nadal doesn't need to prove himself in Master series. For example the long clay season does he really need to contend for all the clay titles? In the end it's Roland Garros that matters.
     
    #24
  25. Excellent post,completely agree
     
    #25
  26. rafan

    rafan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,212
    For yonkers I was always led to believe that the grand slam was a title won at every slam in the course of a year. In my book neither Federer or Nadal then has achieved that - although Rafa did win the olympics, clay and grass but still not the lot.
     
    #26
  27. Gemini

    Gemini Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,577
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Nadal's maybe got 3 more (4 max) in him if he's healthy and relaxes his schedule a bit. Let go of the hunt for the no. 1 ranking and concentrate his efforts around the majors. Same thing for Federer.
     
    #27
  28. kimbahpnam

    kimbahpnam Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2007
    Messages:
    2,675
    90.91% of pollsters say "no."
     
    #28
  29. kobe3pointer

    kobe3pointer Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 11, 2008
    Messages:
    445
    Correction: 91.14%

    But I dont think he can do it either... his playing style as many have stated previously is too extreme and will be his demise...
     
    #29
  30. malakas

    malakas Banned

    Joined:
    May 27, 2006
    Messages:
    15,791
    Location:
    Greece
    I don't think he will reach 10 total,let alone 14.
     
    #30

Share This Page