Will Roger ever beat Nadal in a slam ever again ?

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by Nadal = Borg, May 2, 2011.

?

Will Roger ever beat Nadal in a slam ever again ?

  1. Yes Roger will beat Nadal in a slam again

    29 vote(s)
    34.9%
  2. No Roger will never beat Nadal in a slam again

    29 vote(s)
    34.9%
  3. 50 -50 it's a toss up

    18 vote(s)
    21.7%
  4. Roger and Nadal will never meet I'm a slam final ever again

    7 vote(s)
    8.4%
  1. Nadal = Borg

    Nadal = Borg Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2011
    Messages:
    193
    What do you think?
     
    #1
  2. kishnabe

    kishnabe G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    17,159
    Location:
    Toronto
    Roger will beat Nadal one more time at Wimbledon or US open....but Rafa will smoke him many times...propbably ending the h2h 10-3 or 4 in slams.
     
    #2
  3. nadalbestclass

    nadalbestclass Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2010
    Messages:
    2,488
    Location:
    I'm a girl!
    Sure! Why? Because that eez the tennis, no?

    That being said, he'll probably need some help from Rafa to do it.
     
    #3
  4. paulorenzo

    paulorenzo Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,587
    Location:
    Virginia Beach
    i would like to see them play each other in a slam again, as most people would. they haven't played each other on the big stage in two years, so one would say they're overdue for a meeting at the majors. however, it would take two weeks of good results from both players at the same time to meet up at a semi or a final of a major. It would take some effort to get there, but i wouldn't count federer out if he actually gets to a final/sf to meet nadal.
     
    #4
  5. tlm

    tlm Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2004
    Messages:
    7,515
    I doubt that fed can even make a final.
     
    #5
  6. Netspirit

    Netspirit Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,243
    Location:
    Snoqualmie, WA
    The real question is whether or not Roger will ever beat Nadal again.

    I wish we could watch Federer 2005 vs. Nadal 2010. The best approximations are probably Wimbledon 2007 final and Rome 2006 final.
     
    #6
  7. SoBad

    SoBad Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2006
    Messages:
    7,762
    Location:
    shiran
    Tough question. Federer did really well last time he faced Nadal at the French, and looks to be in his best clay form ever this year, so Nadal should be very scared going into the French.
     
    #7
  8. Bud

    Bud Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    Messages:
    31,167
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Not likely

    However, we'd all still like to see Rafa beat Fed at the USO for the career Fed slam :)
     
    #8
  9. tlm

    tlm Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2004
    Messages:
    7,515
    Ya i am sure that fed is really making him nervous.
     
    #9
  10. borg number one

    borg number one Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,639
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    I would go with Nadal even at Wimbledon, the US Open or the AO as of now, but suppose:

    1. Nadal's is pushed far in his matches, while Federer coasts somewhat and they meet?
    2. There is a significant injury issue.
    3. Federer just gets hot and Nadal is off. Nadal is now expected to prevail, per common wisdom, so Federer could basically just "go for broke" somewhat with less expected of him.
    4. Suppose Federer plays for say 2 more years and experiences a resurgence before retiring? He may have several more chances to do it.

    So, for those reasons, I went with 50-50.
     
    #10
  11. Nadal = Borg

    Nadal = Borg Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2011
    Messages:
    193
    I love the avatar!!!
     
    #11
  12. eidolonshinobi

    eidolonshinobi Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    1,476
    Location:
    Sunny San Diego
    Neutrality ftw
     
    #12
  13. Mick

    Mick Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Messages:
    8,362
    right now nadal is 1, djokovic is 2, federer is 3, and murray is 4.
    let's say all the seeds get through, federer would have to beat both djokovic and nadal to win the title. that's pretty tough.
     
    #13
  14. borg number one

    borg number one Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,639
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    Thanks. That's a great Fila ad with Borg.
     
    #14
  15. borg number one

    borg number one Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,639
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    I agree. That's similar to Borg in 1981. At Wimbledon, he went 5 sets and beat Connors in the SF, but lost to McEnroe. At the US Open, he beat Connors in straight sets in the SF and then faced McEnroe in the final. Beating Connors/McEnroe at the same major (on a fast surface especially) is no easy task. It would be tough, but I think Federer could pull it off. If he played a great SF, things can change very quick in tennis.
     
    #15
  16. Bud

    Bud Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    Messages:
    31,167
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Anything's possible

    However, the likely scenario is Nadal defeats Federer in nearly every future encounter... the exception being the WTF
     
    #16
  17. cocolate

    cocolate Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2009
    Messages:
    236
    if he can't beat Federer at WTF how can he beat him at the much faster USO.This means Federer even has a chance at wimbledon where he is 2-1 with Nadal.
     
    #17
  18. Ray Mercer

    Ray Mercer Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    Messages:
    793
    At this stage of their career Federer would have to be playing excellent and it would probably have to be the US Open or possibly Wimbledon. The French isn't happening and the Aussie is just too slow.
     
    Last edited: May 2, 2011
    #18
  19. BULLZ1LLA

    BULLZ1LLA Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    2,050
    (It's hard to remember the last time it happened, 2007 I'm pretty sure, seems like an eternity because it is)
     
    #19
  20. MichaelNadal

    MichaelNadal Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2007
    Messages:
    29,546
    Location:
    In the middle of tomorrow and yesterday..
    Will he beat Rafa again? Probably, depends on him. At a slam? No.
     
    #20
  21. Bud

    Bud Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    Messages:
    31,167
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    It's not the speed but the low bounce of the indoor WTF surface that gives Federer a huge advantage.

    Federer will never beat Nadal at Wimbledon again. That ship sailed 4 years ago, in 2007, when Federer was in his prime.
     
    #21
  22. cocolate

    cocolate Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2009
    Messages:
    236
    lol, if federer drops mor ein the ranking and meets Nadal at wimbledon in the first week when there is still grass on the court he will surely win.Nadal always has big troubles at wimbledon when the court is in good shape(see last year).
     
    #22
  23. Bud

    Bud Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    Messages:
    31,167
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Assuming Federer continues playing...

    You think in 2-3 years when Federer is 32-33 years old and meeting Nadal (who will be 27-28 ) in the first 3 rounds... Federer will beat Nadal at Wimbledon? :grin:
     
    #23
  24. AlpineCadet

    AlpineCadet Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    4,649
    Federer needs a time-machine to completely pwn everyone leading up to Nadal in a GS. There, are you happy?
     
    #24
  25. cocolate

    cocolate Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2009
    Messages:
    236
    Nadal won't have power left in his knees so i say yes.
     
    #25
  26. borg number one

    borg number one Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,639
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    I forgot for a bit, but that 2007 final was a doozy! Nadal was red hot in that fourth set, then the tweak of the knee and he wasn't the same. I felt that were it not for that point, Nadal was on the verge of taking that title.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axKTGRXGFpQ
     
    #26
  27. borg number one

    borg number one Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,639
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    In tennis, things like that can happen. We'll see how it plays out. It seems as if his recent approach has significantly improved his ability to maintain his knees.
     
    #27
  28. Bud

    Bud Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    Messages:
    31,167
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Nadal's knees seem better now than ever.

    If you look back to his matches from 2004-05 through 2009, he's wearing the tendonitis bands on one or both knees. Since he had the plasma treatment(s), no knee problems.

    So, I wouldn't count on Nadal's knees taking him out of tennis.
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2011
    #28
  29. abmk

    abmk G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2008
    Messages:
    15,916
    Location:
    U.S
    oh please, he was fine after that as well. Held for 4 straight games after that and had federer at 15-40 twice, which federer bailed himself out with phenomenal play ... It was federer who outplayed and out-toughed him , had NOTHING to do with the so called injury - he was moving well and playing well after that as well
     
    #29
  30. tudwell

    tudwell Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2007
    Messages:
    4,408
    I'm a huge Federer fan, but I doubt he'll even reach Nadal again in a slam, let alone beat him.
     
    #30
  31. MichaelNadal

    MichaelNadal Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2007
    Messages:
    29,546
    Location:
    In the middle of tomorrow and yesterday..
    I remember being on the edge of my seat for that 07 Wimby final, good times.
     
    #31
  32. borg number one

    borg number one Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,639
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    Then why did the commentators make specific mention of it? I saw him definitely favoring it. At that time, you don't do that unless it is. He could have won 4 games and still had a knee issue. The two things aren't mutually exclusive. He definitely lost form in my opinion. His level in the middle of the fourth set was excellent and that was his best form of the match overall I thought.
     
    #32
  33. vllaznia

    vllaznia Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2010
    Messages:
    406
    Oh please after the tweak just as abmk said Nadal was fine he had several break points in the final set, but was Federer who saved them with great shots.
     
    #33
  34. cocolate

    cocolate Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2009
    Messages:
    236
    Nadal had one broken leg, 5 broken arms, his balls were bandaged....otherwise he wouldn't have lost.
     
    #34
  35. borg number one

    borg number one Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,639
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    No, I think Federer still may have won that '07 final, but Nadal took it up a level and then Federer would have had to match it. It was a very good match.
     
    #35
  36. TennisFan3

    TennisFan3 Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2009
    Messages:
    5,426
    Sure Fed can beat Nadal in a slam. To do that Fed would need to Tag team Nadal. Sorta like a 1-2-3 punch.

    Delpo - Murray - Fed for ex. By the time Nadal reaches Fed, he'll be ripe for the picking.

    Especially coz Murray is the Vampire who sucks Nadal's blood and makes sure he loses the next match.
     
    #36
  37. TennisFan3

    TennisFan3 Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2009
    Messages:
    5,426
    Nadal f***ed up his own chances because of his knees, not to say Nadal would've definitely won, but it could have been a Wimb '08 like match with both players playing well at the same time.

    In set 4 Rafa had the momentum and Fed was flabbergasted given the way Fed shrieked like a school girl at the umpire. That's probably Fed's worst outburst on a tennis court coz he knew he was being steamrolled and Nadal was in a zone.. Next thing you know Nadal called the trainer just when he had all the momentum in the world. And we're all left wondering.. darn..it's the F****ing knees. Why would Nadal call the trainer at such a crucial time and break him momentum, unless he didn't have an actual problem?

    Anyway, as expected, Fed lifted his game like a champion and put on some of the best clutch serving I've ever seen from him., when he fought of all those breakpoints in set 5. Nadal was hurting, but he was outplayed in the final set, and Fed's resilience and his own fragility drove him to despair until he was a broken man by the end.

    Forget all this, in spite of potentially losing a GS because of his knees, what does Nadal do next? Exactly. He goes to play freaking' Stuttgart immediately after Wimbledon.

    For a guy who's such a great player, Nadal can be incredibly dumb with his scheduling ; he's sacrificed tons of slams by playing on one leg.. That's why I think he probably won't challenge Sampras/Fed's numbers when all is said and done.
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2011
    #37
  38. abmk

    abmk G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2008
    Messages:
    15,916
    Location:
    U.S
    what else did federer do in the 5th set if not raise his level ? Sleep ? Go and watch it again.

    Yes, 4th set was nadal's best level, but he still wouldn't probably have gotten the 2nd break in that set had it not been for hawkeye scr*wing it up . Just because he didn't maintain his 4th set level in the 5th doesn't mean he was affected by the injury , just means his form came down by a bit. The fact that he held rather easily for his next 4 service games and had federer in trouble in 2 of his shows he was still playing darn well. Again, I'll say , watch it again.

    It wasn't just a very good match, it was a great match, only eclipsed by the next year's final , mainly because that involved a longer 5th set and a big comeback . If anything the quality of this match, IMO, was slightly better than the 2008 final
     
    #38
  39. Bud

    Bud Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    Messages:
    31,167
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    I think you're forgetting that in June/July 2007, Nadal had just turned 21 years old. He's learning a bit more each year and seems to have gotten a good feel for what his body can endure... at the ripe age of 24

    After 2009, he really fined tuned his schedule along with fixing his knees.
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2011
    #39
  40. Xemi666

    Xemi666 Professional

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2010
    Messages:
    807
    The better question is if they'll meet again in slams. They can only meet in semis and finals and the past slamshave shown that Federer is not a lock to make the semis anymore.
     
    #40
  41. cocolate

    cocolate Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2009
    Messages:
    236
    if federer goes even lower in the rankings they can meet even lower.
     
    #41
  42. Tony48

    Tony48 Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2008
    Messages:
    6,896
    Australian Open: Probably not
    French Open: LOL!
    Wimbledon: Maybe. If he wanted to win it badly enough, he could win here against Nadal again.
    U.S. Open: Yes. But he'd have to find some way to summon his game like he did at the WTF.
     
    #42
  43. Omega_7000

    Omega_7000 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2009
    Messages:
    4,723
    If Fed regains his form, he can beat Nadal in every Major. With both players in form it's usually just a matter of a few good games because most of their matches are close.

    In his current form, Wim & USO are the only possibilities...
     
    #43
  44. The-Champ

    The-Champ Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2007
    Messages:
    6,541
    Location:
    Sweden

    wimbledon 2007 final (highlights)


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nlkaZalPgY


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rG36OrklLxs&feature=related



    federer served brilliantly especially in that 5th set.
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2011
    #44
  45. mandy01

    mandy01 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    11,518
    Look,Nadal took a medical time-out in their AO 09 final as well if I'm not mistaken.He took a medical time-out during their match in Hamburg only to come back and win seven straight games.The point being-I wouldn't put too much stock on his 'medical time-outs'. He didn't lose the match just because of that.More often than not,he's just fine after coming back,running around like a jack-rabbit.
    If you look at the fifth set,Nadal had multiple chances to win that match and I don't think he was at any point particularly struggling with his movement.It was Roger who had all the pressure to win that match, to win that fifth set ,not Nadal.He went in as the underdog.
    If you go further to see the game where he got broken,he didn't just let it go.Roger had to hit some sensational winners to break him there.
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2011
    #45
  46. mandy01

    mandy01 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    11,518
    How the hell did that mto break his own momentum? He took it between two sets within he time alotted for the changeover,not between two games.
    Also ,your point holds water had Nadal gotten broken immediately after a break.Then you could say he lost some focus/momentum.But that's not what happened.If anything ,he immediately got himself two BPs on Roger's opening service game,could've broken him there and quite possibly could have won the match.
    Oh and Roger himself played loads better in the fifth set than the fourth.So it goes both ways.
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2011
    #46
  47. Sentinel

    Sentinel Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    Messages:
    30,308
    Location:
    Somewhere over the rainbow
    Will Roger ever beat Nadal in a slam ever again ?

    I thought Will Rogers died way back in 1935 ? Shouldn't this be in Former Pro section ?

    He had a good sense of humor and would have won more Slams if he had not opted for a movie career. But yes, a prime Will Rogers against a prime Nadal -- that would be a match for the ages.
     
    #47
  48. Cassius Clay

    Cassius Clay Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    857
    Yes, they'll meet again several times, only to discover that Nadal is still the GOAT.
     
    #48
  49. cocolate

    cocolate Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2009
    Messages:
    236
    we can have that match in acting too...i mean with all that MTO's Nadal would be tough competition.
     
    #49
  50. kishnabe

    kishnabe G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    17,159
    Location:
    Toronto
    True that Rafa was red hot....but I remember Federer losing his concetration in the fourth set because of some call....it was clearly visible that he lost his momentum from the third set!
     
    #50

Share This Page