will tennis-community ever go metric

Discussion in 'Odds & Ends' started by PackardDell, Aug 21, 2007.

  1. PackardDell

    PackardDell Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2007
    Messages:
    486
    In Europe we use the metric system. IMO superior to the AngloSaxon system and therefore I wonder wether the tenniscommunity will ever go full metric. No more mess with sq inch and ounces and lbs and wathever. Just gram and meter.

    A look at the TW site also show an inconsistency. For the length of a racket the people in anglo saxon countries uses inches but for the beam width they use the metric milimeter. A first step in abondoning the AS system?

    Only from a langustic point of view the AS is better. Ounce, inch, pound, mile. It sounds much better than centimeter, kilogram. etc.
     
    #1
  2. gregmiata

    gregmiata Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Messages:
    160
    Location:
    Lexington, KY
    Doubtful for a long time since the US is one of the largest consumers of the product and is wholeheartedly resistant to make the switch to metric. Tennis Warehouse is a US-based company so they will definitely not switch over till the rest of the country already has.

    I think the reason that you see beam width in MM is that even those of us used to the inch demarcation hate to work with fractions of an inch and it is easier to see that 20mm is roughly 10% smaller than 22mm, while figuring out the difference between 17/32 of an inch and 2/3 of an inch makes our poor over-caffeinated brains hurt. :)

    Greg
     
    #2
  3. nyc

    nyc Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,532
    Location:
    SoCal
    #3
  4. Syfo-Dias

    Syfo-Dias Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 29, 2005
    Messages:
    777
    I've never heard it called the Anglo Saxon System before. If we're going to call it that, then let's call metric the French System since that's where it was invented. I believe the correct term is Imperial or Standard Measurement. I spoke to some British friends recently and they seemed pretty reluctant to use metrics, despite the fact it's being forced upon them by the government. They still refer to petrol in gallons instead of liters. Distance in miles and feet. And weight in pounds and ounces. I personally think it's good to know both systems. They both have their pros and cons.
     
    #4
  5. PackardDell

    PackardDell Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2007
    Messages:
    486
    the imperial/AS/standard system has IMO only a linguistic pro

    What is in your opinion the pro ?
     
    #5
  6. Spinner

    Spinner New User

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2007
    Messages:
    31
    I prefer Imperial for things related to driving, like MPG. No idea what would be a good Litre/kilometer comparrison.

    For racquets, for as long as 27" is the standard length, it doesnt make sense to talk about MM. BABOLAT please take note !!
     
    #6

Share This Page