Wilson manufacturing flaws

Discussion in 'Racquets' started by pauliewa, Oct 11, 2012.

  1. pauliewa

    pauliewa New User

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2011
    Messages:
    97
    Location:
    Bay area
    Just switched to the blx 98 and am confused by a few issues between the two racquets I received. One of the racquets doesn't have the text on the butt, like the grip size and other wilson coding I assume. The same frame's red centering dot on the hoop is bigger than on the other. The same frame has no string rec text in the throat, the other does. And though they both have the pro hybrid grip, this same frame has a contoured, or riveted version. New to wilson, and needless to say, I have no idea what to make of all these differences. Thoughts?
     
    #1
  2. themitchmann

    themitchmann Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    2,619
    From where did you buy them?
     
    #2
  3. pauliewa

    pauliewa New User

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2011
    Messages:
    97
    Location:
    Bay area
    Right here, TW
     
    #3
  4. UCSF2012

    UCSF2012 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    1,923
    Different manufacturing batches. Happens all the time, b/c they try out different things. Sometimes, one batch is matte while another is glossy. They're just experimenting. That's all it is.
     
    #4
  5. slowfox

    slowfox Professional

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2011
    Messages:
    1,110
    Shouldn't all the experimenting be done in the development stages? I'm no business expert, but once mass production begins I would think that "trying out different things" is over.
     
    #5
  6. pauliewa

    pauliewa New User

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2011
    Messages:
    97
    Location:
    Bay area
    The only difference that frustrates me is the grip, as I'll have to replace the one with ridges. Now I'm out of pocket because they wanted to 'experiment' once their product is at market? Seems like an outlandish business move to me to say the least.
     
    #6
  7. Bdarb

    Bdarb Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2012
    Messages:
    1,536
    Location:
    New England
    I wonder how far off the static and SW are. Have you hit with them both, notice a difference?
     
    #7
  8. Bartelby

    Bartelby G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    12,381
    I've always wondered how many such batches there are as it would make sense to do an initial run that would satisfy a reasonable estimation of the market.




     
    #8
  9. pauliewa

    pauliewa New User

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2011
    Messages:
    97
    Location:
    Bay area
    I had TW spec match them. Both are 10.85oz and sw 303. Felt the same on court but once I noticed all these cosmetics differences I lost piece of mind there for a minute.
     
    #9
  10. courtking

    courtking Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    600
    Wilson spent most of time and $$ to hype up its products rather than QC.. I have 3 Wilson PS 90 with totally 3 difference specs.. one is way off.. one is head heavy.. and one has bigger grip.. at $200 a piece they should do a better job..
     
    #10
  11. rlau

    rlau Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,231
    Location:
    NL
    Hope you find it back!
     
    #11
  12. Bdarb

    Bdarb Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2012
    Messages:
    1,536
    Location:
    New England
    I know what you mean. You just want two of the same racquet, you had them take the time and spec them out but they just aren't the same. To whoever said at 200 a racquet qc should be higher, absolutely right. Wilson used to be regarded for high standard of quality control didn't they?
     
    #12
  13. travlerajm

    travlerajm Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Messages:
    4,409
    That's nothing. I bought a BLX Pro Tour earlier this year.

    The pallet was misaligned so that it was about 2 degrees rotated along the long axis. That is, the wide flat bevels were not parallel to the racquet face.

    Unless I concsiously concentrate on compensating, forehand volleys pop up too high, and backhand volleys go in the net. So the defect makes the racquet tough to play with. Totally unacceptable. I plan to ask TW for a refund.
     
    #13
  14. Babolatbarry

    Babolatbarry Guest

    one of the red dots on mine is in the middle, while on the other the red dot is one string gap to the right...
    on my six.one 95s
     
    #14
  15. UCSF2012

    UCSF2012 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    1,923
    It's time we protest to Wilson about the QC problems. Unless they listen to customer complaints, I refuse to buy any more rackets from them. 50 and that's it. I refuse to buy a 51st. None of this Amplifeel bullshat.
     
    #15
  16. ace0001a

    ace0001a Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2009
    Messages:
    751
    Not an expert here myself about but having dabbled in comics and collectibles, I think the differences in a product's manufacturing runs are usually termed or described as variants.
     
    #16
  17. Broly4

    Broly4 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2012
    Messages:
    298
    Wilson QC is dissapointing to say the least, no wonder since they don't make rackets in their own factory.
     
    #17
  18. Anton

    Anton Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    3,137
    Location:
    Staten Island
    ???? Head heavy PS90 is definitely a fake.

    I've used many wilsons over the years and grip sizes were consistent once the new grip material breaks in (size gets a bit smaller after some use).
     
    #18
  19. courtking

    courtking Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    600
    Sorry, I meant head heavier compare to the other 2 I have.. like 2-3 points heavier..
     
    #19
  20. db10s

    db10s Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 14, 2012
    Messages:
    1,973
    Location:
    S. FL/Maine
    I played with Wilson for a short period of time, I dropped them and switched to Dunlop because I want all of my rackets to have the same weight, balance, etc... Straight out of the box; it's my zero tolerance policy. From my experience when Dunlop sends me my package, they are perfect.
     
    #20
  21. guitarplayer

    guitarplayer Guest

    I have the same problem with my 3 PS Six One 100's.
     
    #21
  22. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,331
    Many racquet manufacturers (especially Wilson) will make minor changes in the graphics on their racquets throughout its product life cycle so they can easily tell around when a particular racquet was manufactured for warranty purposes.

    It also throws off the counterfeiters making fakes if they are constantly changing the graphics on the authentic ones.
     
    #22
  23. ollinger

    ollinger Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    5,921
    ^^ If racquet graphics were constantly changing, I think it would make life easier for counterfeiters. They could then explain inconsistencies by saying that the company had changed the graphics again. And information about when a racquet was manufactured would be part of the holgraphic sticker.
     
    #23
  24. Chotobaka

    Chotobaka Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,437
    If this actually is their reason for doing this, it would be better to go back to using serial numbers which once upon a time were pretty much standard. Oh, I forgot, Wilson's processes have nothing to do with improving the quality of their products. Even the PJ quality became noticeable lower quality and lower durability with the BLX's.
     
    #24
  25. tistrapukcipeht

    tistrapukcipeht Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    1,324
    Exactly, because one could claim: This is the first cycle of the racquets, it's the same racquet as the newer which would even be easier to sell the fakes since would harder to ID the fakes.
     
    #25
  26. UCSF2012

    UCSF2012 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    1,923
    Wilson doesn't care when you bought your racket. I returned one KPS88 2 years after it was discontinued, and Wilson still honored the warranty, knowing full well that it was impossible to have bought it within the last year. I love Wilson....but if you're reading this, Wilson, no 51st racket unless QC improves.

    ....actually, I wanted to tinker with the Juice 100. So, no 53rd racket unless you improve!!!
     
    #26
  27. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,331
    Riiiight....that's why the U.S. Treasury changes the graphics on U.S. currency so that it would make it easier for counterfeiters to tell people that this is just the newer version of the $100 bill. LOL No, once the people who make the fake racquets think they have the graphics the same as the authentic ones, Wilson changes the graphics so that you can easily go to a pro shop or to Wilson's website and see that the latest version does not match exactly like the fake. It's harder for the counterfeiters to keep up because they never know when Wilson will make a change and what those changes will be.

    As far as the hologram, those often fall off or go missing. Plus, you can take the hologram off of one racquet and put it on another racquet, just like some people do with butt caps. Having different graphics on the frame is a sure way to tell what year a racquet was manufactured.
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2012
    #27
  28. Hi I'm Ray

    Hi I'm Ray Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,504
    Good ol Wilson won't give up the poor QC crown to Babs without a fight.
     
    #28
  29. UCSF2012

    UCSF2012 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    1,923
    I don't see why Wilson would actually care their rackets are being faked. If they really cared, they would've sued e Bay a long time ago. For all we know, Wilson may take a cut in the counterfeit racket sales. Hell, some manufacturers manufacture fakes and sell them on the side. Historically, Wilson doesn't seem to care about the fakes market. At least, they havn't done anything about it.
     
    #29
  30. UCSF2012

    UCSF2012 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    1,923
    ....and string age matters more than racket spec differences. On the court, these "different" rackets generally hit the same.
     
    #30
  31. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,331
    Um...because Wilson loses sales to the fakes? And why would they sue the Bay? They didn't make the fakes. No other company that makes any kind of product that has counterfeits has sued the Bay, either, because it's not legally feasible.
     
    #31
  32. mctennis

    mctennis Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    3,409
    Ditto this remark. I've always found Wilson QC to be spotty and always on the side of sloppy at best. Their commercials are always top notch. It shows.
     
    #32
  33. pauliewa

    pauliewa New User

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2011
    Messages:
    97
    Location:
    Bay area
    What was the warranty issue that caused you to return it?

     
    #33
  34. UCSF2012

    UCSF2012 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    1,923
    Not legally feasible? Louis Vuitton won 14 million in damages or something like that against e Bay. Don't remember the damage amount, but it was high. Really high.
     
    #34
  35. UCSF2012

    UCSF2012 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    1,923
    Frame slightly warped. Hoop wider from 3/9 o'clock compared to my other frames. Gut/poly tends to warp the racket, since the poly crosses are strung looser, but that's just a casualty of war.
     
    #35
  36. UCSF2012

    UCSF2012 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    1,923
    Rackets are handmade. Every one's different, like a pair of designer jeans. Each one's made with love. Each is unique, and no two are exactly alike.
     
    #36
  37. mctennis

    mctennis Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    3,409
    I understand this issue. However, the sloppiness and finish should not be that much different. I've not noticed the sloppy fit and finish with my Kneissl or Volkl racquets over the years. With Wilson they come across as a middle of the line ( or lower) type racquet.
     
    #37
  38. Sumo

    Sumo Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2010
    Messages:
    613
    Location:
    Chapel Hill
    Yeaaahhh......nooooo.....never.......

    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=92022140
     
    #38
  39. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,331
    Well, of course a French court is going to rule in favor of their own companies. Let them try and sue the Bay in the U.S. where they are based.

    BTW, not all fake racquets are sold on the Bay so Wilson suing the Bay is not going to stop the fakes so why bother suing the Bay?
     
    #39
  40. UCSF2012

    UCSF2012 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    1,923
    Do you not want money? If 20 million dollars were just sitting there in front of you, do you not want it? This is a trademark violation for Wilson, part of the reason why Wilson has "horrendous QC." They're taking the heat for rackets that they didn't even make.

    PS, I do believe the owner of e Bay is French.
     
    #40
  41. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,331
    Huh? It's the AUTHENTIC racquets made by Wilson that have the "horrendous QC". I'd bet even the fakes have better QC than the real ones.

    Yes, Wilson should sue, but not the Bay. They should sue the companies that are actually making the fakes. Suing the Bay won't stop the counterfeiters from making fake racquets. They will just find other channels to sell them.

    Oh, and the Bay doesn't have an owner. It is a publicly traded company so it's owned by millions of shareholders.
     
    Last edited: Oct 16, 2012
    #41
  42. Lilguy1456

    Lilguy1456 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2012
    Messages:
    782
    If you get a HeadHeavy PS, then yes, you have a fake. However, if you are concerned with your 'center dot'...then you should probably begin to concern yourself more with your technique. Inferior players often try to compensate for lack of skill by obsessing over slight differences in racquet spec/cosmetic.
     
    #42
  43. UCSF2012

    UCSF2012 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    1,923
    Chill out. The center dot bit was a joke.
     
    #43
  44. UCSF2012

    UCSF2012 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    1,923
    Wilson gets crap for their rackets and fake rackets posing as theirs. Most people can't even tell fakes apart from real. Truthfully, a great percentage of my friends use fake rackets, and only after I tell them that do they realize how crappy their racket is. It was gold until I told them.

    Are you now some legal expert? A few days ago, you thought suing e Bay wasn't feasible, despite the 65 million e Bay lost in damages. Now you're giving legal advice.

    And the CEO (or former CEO) and Founder of e Bay is French. Pierre something. It's the French suing the French in a French court. There comes a certain point when your claims are just infantile. Making up things as you go.
     
    #44
  45. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,331
    If people can't even tell fake Wilson racquets from real ones then what's the problem for users?

    Um....the Bay "lost $65 million in damages"? They haven't lost a dime! Just because some judge rules that you have to pay $65 million doesn't mean you've paid a dime. It goes to appeal as most of these cases do. In fact, earlier this year, another judge in France overturned the earlier ruling on appeal. So as of today, the Bay hasn't lost a dime (other than on legal fees). So, no, it's not feasible to sue the Bay unless you want to spend tens of millions of dollars on legal fees for nothing.
    http://www.4-traders.com/LVMH-4669/...Rulings-In-LVMH-s-Case-Against-****-14311372/

    The founder of the Bay, Pierre Omidyar, is an Iranian-American. He was only born in France because his Iranian parents were studying at university in France at the time he was born. He has lived in the U.S. from the age of six. So I would hardly call him "French" and I doubt he has any personal connections or allegiance to France. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Omidyar

    In any case, Omidyar has not been the CEO since 1998 when the Bay had only 30 employees.
     
    #45
  46. UCSF2012

    UCSF2012 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    1,923
    Your reading skills need work. What the article said isn't what you claimed.

    The problem for Wilson is that they take the heat for someone else's product. So what if the racket cracks prematurely? Who does the buyer blame?....Wilson, and they didn't even make the racket. You should already know all this. What is it that you're arguing. Pretend for a second you're Wilson, and you can easily come up with a laundry list of things wrong. You don't need me to point them out to you. Do your own thinking.
     
    Last edited: Oct 16, 2012
    #46
  47. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,331
    Has the Bay paid a dime to LVMH? No? That's exactly what I said. All LVMH did was lose millions of of dollars themselves in legal fees trying to sue the Bay. So do you still think it's feasible to sue the Bay for selling fake products? The courts in the U.S. have actually ruled in favor of the Bay on these same types of lawsuits.
     
    #47

Share This Page