Wimbledon easier to win now

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by richied, Jun 24, 2009.

  1. richied

    richied Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2009
    Messages:
    316
    I was just thinking wimbledon is a cake walk compared to 20 years ago.

    Courier, Becker, Edberg, Agassi, Goran, Pete, playing in the same era, all with healthy chances to win wimbledon on their day!!


    Nowadays, your chances look a little brighter. IMO

    You only have to worry about Fed and Nadal to be honest...obviously ninja's, but still at least a better chance to make it to the semi
     
    #1
  2. RoddickAce

    RoddickAce Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,467
    Depends on who you are lolz...I doubt someone like Simon wouldn't be worried about Djokovic, Murray, Roddick, Karlovic, Tsonga, Cilic, etc.
     
    #2
  3. IvanAndreevich

    IvanAndreevich Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    7,492
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    Ding-dong we have a winner.
     
    #3
  4. EtePras

    EtePras Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2008
    Messages:
    733
    If it was so easy, there would be more than 2 people in the draw who've done it.
     
    #4
  5. egn

    egn Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    4,973

    Yea thats if you are not one of those guys today players only worry about Federer, Nadal, Djokovic, Murray, Roddick, Karlovic, Tsonga, Cilic, Ancic..I think you get the drift. Also 20 years ago..89? or are we talking 90? Either way Courier had one good wimbledon year, in 1990 Sampras was no threat at wimbledon, Agassi wasn't even playing them..not sure about Goran, but Edberg and Becker were there.... >.> I would say 93-94 was a deep wimbledon field thats about it though.
     
    #5
  6. TBobLP

    TBobLP Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2009
    Messages:
    309
    Location:
    South Florida
    not any easier...still have to win 7 in a row.
     
    #6
  7. Nadal_Freak

    Nadal_Freak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    10,625
    Location:
    Harker Heights, Texas
    I thought this was another thread to discredits Nadal's win last year by saying it is easier to win on the new grass or something crazy like that. All-court players is the way it is these days. Surfaces are not full of specialists anymore.
     
    #7
  8. FedFan_2009

    FedFan_2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2009
    Messages:
    2,353
    Location:
    Cylon Base Ship
    Yeah easy as pie to beat Fed....
     
    #8
  9. ChanceEncounter

    ChanceEncounter Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,269
    Exactly.

    Roger Federer and Lleyton Hewitt are the only two people in the entire draw that's won the tournament before.
     
    #9
  10. tacou

    tacou Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,039
    very easy all you have to do is win 7 matches. they should change it to 8 ! that way it will be equal to when sampras won.
     
    #10
  11. egn

    egn Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    4,973
    huh what sampras only won 7 though....
    1r
    2r
    3r
    4r
    qf
    sf
    f

    ??where is this 8?
     
    #11
  12. tacou

    tacou Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,039
    yeah but it was obviously much harder to win back then as the brilliant OP stated, so by adding an extra match or maybe best of 7 sets it will as prestigious a tournament as then :D
     
    #12
  13. rwn

    rwn Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2006
    Messages:
    417
    I stopped reading when I saw the name Courier mentioned as a great grasscourter.
     
    #13
  14. joeri888

    joeri888 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    13,120
    +1, it's a shame though, because it was a lot better to have as many diversity as there used to be. I think the homogenous surfaces, players etc. is very bad for tennis as a whole.
     
    #14
  15. syntex1

    syntex1 New User

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2004
    Messages:
    85
    As its been said by commentators on tv or about twenty other topics its the fact u can stand six foot behind the court and hit cross court winners into the service box of your opponent that u dont see as many serve volley players. string and racquets are the reason.

    my theory is with all the sucess the spanish and french federations are having over last 10 years + with the number of good players they produce that make top 100, their coaching is based mostly around clay court tennis as juinors better point construction, longer rallies, more reliable ground strokes, etc, this sucess means a few other countries have adopted their trainning techniques which means alot more baseliners. You also get alot of players from all over the world trainning with these squads aswell as its a proven formula for sucess.
     
    #15

Share This Page