wimbledon needs to speed up their courts

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by califsurferboy33, Jun 8, 2008.

  1. califsurferboy33

    califsurferboy33 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2007
    Messages:
    645
    alright im sick of this, y is the us open faster then wimbledon, wimbledon needs to stop being ridiculous and speed up the courts!
     
    #1
  2. BeHappy

    BeHappy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2007
    Messages:
    4,789
    I agree, it's just too slow now, It's the same speed and bounce height as green clay.
     
    #2
  3. Vision84

    Vision84 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Messages:
    1,655
    Location:
    Cambridge, UK
    While I agree whole heartedly this issue has come up many times.
     
    #3
  4. quest01

    quest01 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,611
    It's because of the fans. Majority of casual and diehard Tennis fans, mostly casual fans wanted to slow down the courts so they could see more baseline rallies.
     
    #4
  5. tennis_hand

    tennis_hand Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,427
    sorry, man. it is toooo late to call.

    do you think they can change their surface at this right moment and be ready for Wimbledon?

    if they haven't changed in the last 2 years, why do you think they will change now?

    I think they should just scrap the grass and change to green clay instead. :roll::roll:
     
    #5
  6. califsurferboy33

    califsurferboy33 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2007
    Messages:
    645
    i know its getting ridiculous, i think one of the main reasons that nadal does so well at wimbledon is that its sooo slow, i mean granted he serves in volleys and does have a decent net game and im not bashing him at all, but seriously wimbledon, if you are out there, SPEED THEM UP!
     
    #6
  7. Nadal_Monfils

    Nadal_Monfils Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2007
    Messages:
    619
    Wimbledon is nowhere near green clay. They replayed last year's Wimbledon final and the majority of the points were somewhat short and Nadal was standing much closer to the baseline than he does at any other tournament.
     
    #7
  8. Nadal_Freak

    Nadal_Freak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    10,625
    Location:
    Harker Heights, Texas
    Well I put some more tedious work and got the US Open, Wimbledon, and Aussie Open stats here. Wimbledon is still the fastest. The main difference is the height of the ball and better bounces than it used to have.
    Wimbledon Breaking Percentage (Total) 17.337%
    US Open Breaking Percentage (Total) 21.87%
    Aussie Open Breaking Percentage (Total) 23.179%
    Monte Carlo Breaking Percentage (Total) 29.22%
    Roland Garros Breaking Percentage (Total) 24.132%
    Hamburg Breaking Percentage (Total) 26.8%
    Rome Breaking Percentage (Total) 23.34%
     
    #8
  9. mrDamien

    mrDamien Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2007
    Messages:
    2,352
    The Wimby was a built up success for Fed. He much enjoying there rather than clay as he can't play in good form either. The Roland Garros too fast for him to catch the ball. Shameful Fed.
     
    #9
  10. jman

    jman Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2006
    Messages:
    664
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    This is so true. I remember back in 1999, when Sampras was on a roll at Wimby, majority of the fans found watching pros serving aces and volleying winners boring. So Wimbledon listens, and changes to a slower surface, and now fans want to speed it up.

    You simply cannot please everyone.

    We really need all grandslams to have different surfaces, with different speeds to make each one unique.
     
    #10

Share This Page