Win/Loss totals for all surfaces:2003-Present

[mcenroefan]

In searching for match statistics, I came across records across all surfaces. Thought some might find it interesting. Apologies if someone has already posted this data. You can run the data for any time period if anyone wants to see a different period. I can't vouch for the accuracy of the site. Cheers.

Surface Leaders (2003 - 2011)
ATP - MAJOR EVENTS
TOTAL
1. Roger Federer 599-82
2. Rafael Nadal 481-102
3. Andy Roddick 461-140
4. Nikolay Davydenko 389-216
5. David Ferrer 342-204
6. Novak Djokovic 329-105
7. Tommy Robredo 328-204
8. Ivan Ljubicic 305-178
9. Fernando Gonzalez 295-153
10. Juan Carlos Ferrero 287-159
CLAY
1. Rafael Nadal 204-16
2. David Ferrer 163-80
3. Nikolay Davydenko 155-75
4. Tommy Robredo 150-64
5. Juan Carlos Ferrero 145-58
6. Carlos Moya 144-63
7. Nicolas Almagro 136-78
8. Filippo Volandri 133-86
9. Juan Monaco 132-76
10. Roger Federer 128-24
HARD
1. Roger Federer 276-37
2. Andy Roddick 250-67
3. Rafael Nadal 193-51
4. James Blake 169-76
5. Lleyton Hewitt 162-64
6. Novak Djokovic 144-35
7. Nikolay Davydenko 136-71
8. Andy Murray 125-41
9. David Ferrer 121-72
10. Tommy Robredo 120-84
IHARD
1. Roger Federer 83-13
2. Robin Soderling 81-33
3. Andy Roddick 77-24
4. Andy Murray 74-17
5. Ivan Ljubicic 66-35
6. Novak Djokovic 63-20
7. Radek Stepanek 63-30
8. Jarkko Nieminen 60-43
9. Nikolay Davydenko 56-35
10. Gael Monfils 49-19
CARPET
1. Ivan Ljubicic 45-20
2. Mikhail Youzhny 35-18
3. Nikolay Davydenko 33-16
4. Roger Federer 31-5
5. David Nalbandian 27-12
6. Max Mirnyi 25-15
7. Robin Soderling 22-6
8. Andy Roddick 22-10
9. Mario Ancic 22-15
10. Radek Stepanek 21-17
GRASS
1. Roger Federer 81-3
2. Andy Roddick 65-12
3. Lleyton Hewitt 52-15
4. Rafael Nadal 40-8
5. Andy Murray 40-12
6. Mario Ancic 38-12
7. Ivo Karlovic 37-14
8. Jonas Bjorkman 34-18
9. Sebastien Grosjean 33-14
10. Mardy Fish 33-16

WTA - MAJOR EVENTS

 

[Bud]

In searching for match statistics, I came across records across all surfaces. Thought some might find it interesting. Apologies if someone has already posted this data. You can run the data for any time period if anyone wants to see a different period. I can't vouch for the accuracy of the site. Cheers.

Surface Leaders (2003 - 2011)
ATP - MAJOR EVENTS
TOTAL
1. Roger Federer 599-82
2. Rafael Nadal 481-102
3. Andy Roddick 461-140
4. Nikolay Davydenko 389-216
5. David Ferrer 342-204
6. Novak Djokovic 329-105
7. Tommy Robredo 328-204
8. Ivan Ljubicic 305-178
9. Fernando Gonzalez 295-153
10. Juan Carlos Ferrero 287-159

Federer's record is 752-174... and he's behind Nadal for overall win %. not sure where you got your info.

Nadal is 478/102 (prior to the AO 11)

 

[Sid_Vicious]

^^Major events and after 2003.

 

[Roy125]

Um Bud, are you sure that's not during 2003? When he started winning all those slams?

 

[Bud]

Did you get this info from the ATP site?

 

[Clay lover]

Federer's record is 752-174... and he's behind Nadal for overall win %. not sure where you got your info.

Nadal is 478/102 (prior to the AO 11)

Fed's career did not begin in 2003.

 

[Bud]

Um Bud, are you sure that's not during 2003? When he started winning all those slams?

Lol! Ah, the OP is trying to make it look favorable to Federer.

To the OP:

Let's do real numbers not slanted numbers.

 

[mcenroefan]

From here:

http://tennis.matchstat.com/

I'm sure if you run the stats going farther back, you'll get more totals...no need to get upset about it.

I ran it the way I did b/c as you go farther back, certain players of interest started dropping off the list.

I thought it was interesting b/c it shows totals across all surfaces.

 

[Roy125]

Yeah, that was what I was thinking. I thought it was unusual that he picked 2003 to start with.

 

[Bud]

From here:

http://tennis.matchstat.com/

I'm sure if you run the stats going farther back, you'll get more totals...no need to get upset about it.

I ran it the way I did b/c as you go farther back, certain players of interest started dropping off the list.

I thought it was interesting b/c it shows totals across all surfaces.

Why not do a historical total as far back as it goes?

Why start at 2003? lol

 

[Bud]

oy.. Radwanska just pegged a ballboy in the head with a hard FH

 

[mcenroefan]

Lol! Ah, the OP is trying to make it look favorable to Federer.

To the OP:

Let's do real numbers not slanted numbers.

Why don't you take a deep breath before jumping down someone's throat?

 

[Bud]

Why don't you take a deep breath before jumping down someone's throat?

It appears your attempting to present slanted information to make a certain player's record look better than it is :grin:

 

[mcenroefan]

It appears your attempting to present slanted information to make a certain player's record look better than it is :grin:

I told you why I ran it the way I did. Go there yourself and run it any way you like....knock yourself out.

 

[mcenroefan]

It appears your attempting to present slanted information to make a certain player's record look better than it is :grin:

In your spasmodic typing frenzy, did you notice that I stated as follows in the original post:

"You can run the data for any time period if anyone wants to see a different period. I can't vouch for the accuracy of the site. Cheers."

 

[Bud]

I told you why I ran it the way I did. Go there yourself and run it any way you like....knock yourself out.

What's the point? Who cares about surface win/loss records starting from 2003?

Is this info significant is some way?

 

[Rippy]

What's the point? Who cares about surface win/loss records starting from 2003?

Is this info significant is some way?

Well you can use the site to find out other time periods if you want.

That could surely be potentially interesting, to see who was winning most in certain years.

 

[mcenroefan]

What's the point? Who cares about surface win/loss records starting from 2003?

Is this info significant is some way?

I also said in my original post that some might find it interesting. Obviously, you don't find it interesting. Go somewhere else.

 

[DownTheLine]

Lol! Ah, the OP is trying to make it look favorable to Federer.

To the OP:

Let's do real numbers not slanted numbers.

Speak English, no?

 

[SStrikerR]

What's the point? Who cares about surface win/loss records starting from 2003?

Is this info significant is some way?

He gave his reasons why he started at 2003, stop crying about it and go use whatever years you want.

 

[anantak2k]

Thanks OP.

Haters gonna hate... just ignore them. I was thinking maybe you can put the win percentage next to the win/loss stats.

 

[mcenroefan]

Thanks OP.

Haters gonna hate... just ignore them. I was thinking maybe you can put the win percentage next to the win/loss stats.

Thanks. I may get to that next. I really wish there was a comprehensive stats site out there. I would love to see how the win loss percentages by surface run across the last 30-40 years. I will post more as I have the time.

 

[Sid_Vicious]

Mcenroefan, awesome post. I immediately favorited the website posted. It is a great resource.

 

[stevenwags987]

Nadals clay record and Federers grass record are both absolutely ridiculous...

 

[mcenroefan]

Mcenroefan, awesome post. I immediately favorited the website posted. It is a great resource.

Thanks. Leave it to the betting public to put together this type of data!

 

[mcenroefan]

Nadals clay record and Federers grass record are both absolutely ridiculous...

I know. I would love to see how they stack up Sampras, Borg, Mac, Lendl, Connors, etc. The site only retrieves data back to 1990 and I don't think the data from the 90's is complete. It seems like the stats from the last decade are pretty complete.

When you look at it this way, it really gives some texture to how the different players perform across the board.

 

[Mustard]

Nadal is 203-16 on clay in his career, 202-15 since the start of 2003.

 

[mcenroefan]

Nadal is 203-16 on clay in his career, 202-15 since the start of 2003.

He's quite amazing on clay. Wish we could see Borg, Vilas, and all of the clay court specialists from the past decades. Even though I don't like comparin eras, it would still be interesting to see.

 

[Mustard]

Since the 11th April 2005, Nadal is 163-4 on clay.

 

[powerangle]

It appears your attempting to present slanted information to make a certain player's record look better than it is :grin:

Why get your panties in a bunch? Don't be so sensitive because the OP didn't post stats your way. Feel free to start another thread and post stats the way you like. The OP posted stats from 2003 on, which are accurate/unslanted as per the thread title.

Go post "XXXX - present" if it suits your fancy.