Working my game to suit a mid?

Discussion in 'Tennis Tips/Instruction' started by Cup8489, Oct 9, 2011.

  1. Cup8489

    Cup8489 Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    9,243
    Location:
    Silvis, IL
    Hey; I have a question here, and I'm not sure how to solve it myself.

    I've always enjoyed midsize racquets, regardless of the company they come from; I've owned a Prince NXG Mid, a POG Mid (modern TW variant), BLX90, Wilson Graphite Force, Wilson sting, A PK Copper Ace, and perhaps one or two I've forgotten.

    I LOVE the way the racquet feels, the control and predictable response, plus the (usually) less stiff feel.

    My problem is, being something around a 3.0 (being modest here, I could really be a 3.5 and have been told such by teaching pros on a few occasions), I find that, in general, I don't get the putaway power I can get with larger sized frames..

    I currently rock the MG Radical MP and Speed MP 16x19, and while I play very well with the speed, It doesn't have the feel that a Mid does, the sense of what the racquet and ball are doing;

    My question is, how do I work on my game in order to allow myself more success with a mid? I hit with relatively conservative grips (extreme eastern fh, still up in the air about a 1hbh or 2hbh; but do both well), and mostly stay at the baseline but will come to net if I find a good opportunity to do so with relatively small risk.

    I'm not sure what to do.. and I realize this is very, vague. If you have questions beyond what I've said, I'll do my best to answer.

    Also, 5' 8" and somewhat overweight, though working on my strength and conditioning as well as losing the unnecessary pounds for faster movement.
     
    #1
  2. Cup8489

    Cup8489 Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    9,243
    Location:
    Silvis, IL
    No love for this thread.
     
    #2
  3. Drop Snot

    Drop Snot New User

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    7
    I've always been able to generate plenty of power and I think its because I have incorporated hitting dropped balls as part of my practice. I toss the ball up in the air, wind up, let it bounce, then take a good crack at it. I focus on generating lots of spin, depth and accuracy. Hitting tossed balls forces you to generate all the power without relying on your opponents pace.
    One caveat: If you only hit dropped balls without playing real opponents then you will start to lose your timing. For the backhand I need a little extra time to set up correctly so I toss the ball extra high and hit it on the second bounce.
     
    #3
  4. Fuji

    Fuji Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2010
    Messages:
    6,591
    Learn to take the net, and mids will become your greatest friends!

    Honestly, I switched to the APD FROM my mids because I just didn't have the proper game to bash with mids from the baseline. In doubles I still use them exclusively, but in singles, a bit more room for error is awesome.

    However if I played a more classic styled flat hitting game, mids would be perfect. Topspin + Mid's = Fuji's mishits, a lot.

    ;)

    -Fuji
     
    #4
  5. LeeD

    LeeD Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    36,412
    Location:
    East side of San Francisco Bay
    Putaway power is generate from a long, fast swing that goes somewhat thru the ball for a POP and lots of ball speed with good placement.
    Should be possible with any racket.
    The big stiff rackets only add pace when you block the ball, or swing tentatively and timidly. Swing big, those big rackets do not add any power and take away controll.
    So swing big, fast, and long.
     
    #5
  6. dozu

    dozu Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    4,546
    due to the under-powered nature of most mids, adding lead is almost universally necessary to make the mids powerful enough to produce deep shots without you have to strain the swing.

    the test is easy.... play smooth and see the landing pattern... if they are CONSISTENT, you are good... if they all land near the service line, you only need a few inches of lead to completely change your game to be a deep player.

    if they land all over the place, you have a technique issue.
     
    #6
  7. Fuji

    Fuji Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2010
    Messages:
    6,591
    Very true. Only the KPS88, and the Youtek Prestige Mid haven't needed a bit of lead from my experience to get good depth.

    -Fuji
     
    #7
  8. SStrikerR

    SStrikerR Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    2,046
    Location:
    Not Fantasy Land
    Better yet, don't string so tight, or stop swinging like a girl. Lead isn't needed in any way whatsoever. You shouldn't need lead to give you more depth. If your shots are all landed service line or shorter, lead isn't your problem. You need to string looser or get a racquet you can actually swing.
     
    #8
  9. Fuji

    Fuji Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2010
    Messages:
    6,591
    Have you ever played an RDS001 Mid? That is easily the lowest powered stick I've EVER hit with. It needed a bit of lead, even when I strung it at 53lbs!

    -Fuji
     
    #9
  10. dozu

    dozu Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    4,546
    looser tension and adding lead only produce the similar depth within certain swing speed (usually quite slow ones).

    in other words, you can string it loose and hit it deep, but you can't swing hard and produce heavy balls with it.

    this is why Sampras lead up the beast to 14+ oz and strung it up to 70 lbs... instead of using a stock PS85 at 55lbs.
     
    #10
  11. BagelMe

    BagelMe Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2010
    Messages:
    518
    Be honest...you like mids because they look sexy.
    :)
     
    #11
  12. Cup8489

    Cup8489 Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    9,243
    Location:
    Silvis, IL
    Of course, I didnt bother saying that because honestly, who DOESNT know that?? :)

    Nothing like a Wilson tour90 with a nice soft feel string to me.. Same with the POG.

    I'm considering just buying one of these two since both are fairly cheap (the new BLX frame from next year just doesnt look great to me, first time i've said that in a while)

    but I'd really like to get my hands on a decent condition pair of N90's.. my all time favorite PJ.
     
    #12
  13. Caesar

    Caesar Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2011
    Messages:
    765
    Maybe I'm missing something, but shouldn't you be matching your racquet to your game rather than the other way around?

    The Speed is 100si right? If you want a bit more feel and control, just drop down to a smaller midplus with a denser string pattern. If you like the Wilson Tour 90, try the Tour 95 18x20.

    Mids are fun but I wouldn't bother changing my game just so I could use one.
     
    Last edited: Oct 10, 2011
    #13
  14. Cup8489

    Cup8489 Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    9,243
    Location:
    Silvis, IL
    Well, thats the thing. My game suits playing with mids very well... i've always seemed to have issues with anything larger than 95 inches because there seems to be less feel and consistency from a larger frame.

    I like the speed bc it has alot of easy power and spin and allows me to get good consistent depth, but it doesnt have the precision of a mid. I get good depth with mids as well, but my serves dont have the pop and spin, and it's hard to use an aggressive attacking style. I can do it, but it requires more work.

    I played better tennis in high school with a 93 18x20 prince NXG mid than with a 100" 16x19 hybrid hornet despite the greater pace I could generate with the hornet; but I'd like to make my game so that I can use the mid to control rallies rather than for consistency like I do now. Just not sure how to do it mostly.
     
    #14

Share This Page