worse technology

Discussion in 'Racquets' started by Ryoma Kun, Dec 29, 2004.

?

which sucked more?

  1. wilson rollers

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. babolat aero

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. graphite racquets all together suck

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. Ryoma Kun

    Ryoma Kun Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2004
    Messages:
    552
    wilson rollers or babolat aero

    ps- does anyone on the boards actually use the aerotour?
     
    #1
  2. ismashall

    ismashall Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2004
    Messages:
    252
    Why isn't there an option in that poll for 'Ryoma Kun?"
     
    #2
  3. moosryan

    moosryan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,553
    i hit with the early aeros. might have well been hitting with a 2x4
     
    #3
  4. Ronaldo

    Ronaldo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    14,330
    Rollers were weird, especially when a stringer showed one that jammed, go figure. Used an Aerotour Limited. Tad bit stiff but suppose if you have a fast western swing, may be awesome. Roller racquets play really soft but not sure where the ball will land.
     
    #4
  5. eqtytrdr

    eqtytrdr Guest

    played with the aero tour +, not much feel from this racket and design hindered areodynamics when flattening out strokes for put aways.
     
    #5
  6. Ronaldo

    Ronaldo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    14,330
    Never really thought of the hindrance when serving or on overheads. So stiff you could crush the ball regardless of any hindrance. So stiff, could feel the PD flex in direct comparison. Grommets, hated them, thin, easy to break. Other than that, sweet, buttery leather grip
     
    #6
  7. ClemsonTennis9

    ClemsonTennis9 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2004
    Messages:
    172
    how about the prince more?
     
    #7
  8. USCfan

    USCfan Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2004
    Messages:
    815
    I agree that the aero racquets were terrible. The new Aeropro Control, on the other hand, is awesome.
     
    #8
  9. raven5288

    raven5288 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    390
    more tech and air handle.
     
    #9
  10. Steve Huff

    Steve Huff Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    7,280
    The Blackburne Double Strung has the least needed technology made for rackets. You don't really need 2 string planes, and it sure makes stringing it more difficult. Wilson wasn't the first to use Rollers anyway. Either the Aldila Cannon or the Tony Trabert rackets (both early graphites) used a type of rollers instead of grommeted holes.
     
    #10
  11. K!ck5w3rvE

    K!ck5w3rvE Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,621
    No but there will be millions using the AeroPro Drive.
     
    #11
  12. ismashall

    ismashall Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2004
    Messages:
    252
    My vote is for "Ryoma Kun."
     
    #12
  13. Stormwolf

    Stormwolf Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2004
    Messages:
    205
    intellifibers/liquidmetal/titanium/hypercarbon/nanotech/more/

    ^^^

    That is the worst technology :D
     
    #13
  14. NoBadMojo

    NoBadMojo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    11,915
    Location:
    Parts unknown
    How about the Head Chipsystem? you know..the frame with a computer chip in it? gimme a break.....next they will incorporate a mobile phone, pda, and toaster into a tennis racquet..you can return phone calls and also make lunch with your racquet on changeoevers.....to me, any of the stuff Head comes up with is pretty useless technology...
     
    #14
  15. Stormwolf

    Stormwolf Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2004
    Messages:
    205
    *LOL* - phone / toaster..that's pretty funny. You need a mike in the handle and special speaker strings. I think it can be done :D
     
    #15
  16. hummer23

    hummer23 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    1,558
    if you guys are so anti technological advances . . .do you think wooden racquets were better? do you think youd play as good as you do now? also, one really good technology is babolats coating on natural gut, all the otehr companies have similar coatings now, and its a great idea that makes gut logical and somewhat cost effective to use.
     
    #16
  17. NoBadMojo

    NoBadMojo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    11,915
    Location:
    Parts unknown
    there you go....incorporate a mr microphone into the butt cap and you can shout out the score on every point and really annoy your opponent............
     
    #17
  18. Alley Cat

    Alley Cat Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    261
    Yeah! Those LM Prestiges and Radicals are the worst! :)
     
    #18
  19. Brian Purdie

    Brian Purdie Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    649
    Yes, I recall the head micro chip back in 99 or 00. The theory was that there are electrical impulses created by the racket when the ball strikes the strings. As a result, the battery in the grip would be activated and, during the racket flexion, the strings of the racket bed would stiffen to counteract the force of the ball. It costs about $419 and, you're not gonna beleive this, it was a beginners model tennis racket (for those naive & new to the game).
     
    #19
  20. Exci

    Exci Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2004
    Messages:
    145
    The Aero technology is not bad, the first racquets just were. Think of it: it is a proven technology after all. It did what it was supposed to do, didn't it? If you've even played with one of the Aerotours you know that racquetspeed was incredicbly easy to create. Sure there were some problems with flatter strokes, but you can't blame the Aero technology for that; blame the R&D for not thinking of that. On top of that, the sticks were just too stiff, but that had nothing to do with the Aero tech either.

    The Aero technology actually works, eventhough it had to be altered in a way, and the Aero Pro Drive or Aero Pro Control are perfect examples of that.

    As for grommets: nothing has actually been proven about this, so we're left in the dark. All I know is that both the rollers and the woofer system is based on the same princinple and that both technologies do have their advocates. I wonder how my PC plays without woofer though..

    ps.: Can I already vote for worst poll of 2005?
     
    #20
  21. tedmeister

    tedmeister Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
    Messages:
    330
    Location:
    Where I am at
    I haven't met a stringer who liked the first generation More series from Prince. This one would definitely give the rollers a run for its money. Snapped a VS touch job once,3 sensations an excel premium and counting...and if the string survives because it is tough, then it starts to cut through the frame over time. The Head chip system, although the subject of a lot of jokes came up with a pretty decent power frame in the iX16. The first generation S18, is forgettable. Not really designed for beginners but for short stroked seniors who head figures have a lot of money stashed away after retiring. The technology makes a lot of sense but the degree of effectivity is debatable.
     
    #21
  22. Goran

    Goran New User

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2004
    Messages:
    70
    I'd say the Head Intelligence, which is supposed to reduce frame vibration. All it does is take away feel. Why put intellifibres in a prestige when you can hit a brick with the original version and not feel any bad vibration whatsoever? Most of the 'technologies' put in new frames claim to solve problems that are easily fixed through good engineering.
     
    #22

Share This Page