Would Isner, Raonic or karlovic have won a slam in the 90s?

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by djokovic2008, Oct 14, 2012.

  1. djokovic2008

    djokovic2008 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,697
    With the surface speeds back then certainly raonic and Isner would have had a good chance. This tells me the that the surface speeds are just about right at the moment given the quality of today's final where all round players can shine.
     
    #1
  2. Babolatbarry

    Babolatbarry Guest

    Isner and Raonic could win a slam in the next 3 years for all we know
     
    #2
  3. 90's Clay

    90's Clay Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2012
    Messages:
    7,330
    ROFLMAO.. No. They are crappage off the ground.. None of them have any speed, foot movement or anything other then a serve. (Isner is ok off the ground once in a while)


    They are brokeback versions of Goran.. And Goran didn't even win a slam until 2001. They wouldn't have won anything in the 90s.


    Just having a serve alone does not guarantee ANYTHING in any era.

    Roddick probably would have been lucky to win a slam in the 90s. Yet.. Somehow trash like Raonic, Isner or Karlovic would?
     
    Last edited: Oct 14, 2012
    #3
  4. Romismak

    Romismak Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2011
    Messages:
    294
    Milos will win slam in future and yes would win in 90s

    Isner-maybe USO- would have shot, that´s it

    Ivo-most people would say no way he is worst off the ground among those 3 guys, but i say he would have shot at Wimbledon-he is great on grass and at his serving peak he is untouchable on grass so on old ,,faster,, grass i can see him to have chance + he is good volleyear, he would love era SV without baseline rallies - in 2009 he was in Wimby QF-in 2007 he was serving even better, so IVo on faster grass, going to net more often winning matches trough tie-breaks i can see that - but only at his serving peak
     
    #4
  5. tennisaddict

    tennisaddict G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2009
    Messages:
    14,604
    Thomas Johansson could win 2002 AO.

    Raonic , Isner and Karlovic cannot win ?
     
    #5
  6. djokovic2008

    djokovic2008 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,697

    Definetly think Raonic would have won a slam in the 90s, Isner would have a shot his ground game just as good if not better than gorans.
     
    #6
  7. TMF

    TMF Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Messages:
    21,214
    They both have better ground game than Goran, and Isner's fh has vastly improved(his monster serve + fh put away has been a great one-two punch). Raonic began to develop some consistent from the baseline. I don't see no reason why they wouldn't win a slam in the 90s, especially when the conditions are suitable for big server.
     
    #7
  8. djokovic2008

    djokovic2008 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,697
    The thing I want people to recognise is that everyone says the surfaces are so slow which is fine but raonic, karlovic and Isner STILL hold over 93% of the time so imagine what they would do in a faster era. These guys have either truly INCREDIBLE serves even better than a good majority of those big servers in the 90s or I'm I missing something.
     
    #8
  9. 90's Clay

    90's Clay Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2012
    Messages:
    7,330
    Thing is if they played in the 90s, that means less access to the racket technology we have today with the lux strings, so there would be quite a bit taken off their serve chances are.

    These guys are the equivalent of a Phillopousis or someone.. And he didn't win a slam either.. None of them are any better then he was really. If you want to put them in the 90s you have to put them under the same situations that everyone else had.. That means giving the same racket technology as well
     
    #9
  10. Steve0904

    Steve0904 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2012
    Messages:
    10,899
    Location:
    NL, Canada
    Neither of those guys would win a slam. They cannot volley for one, and they are mostly serve for another. They wouldn't win on clay obviously, and they would've had to get a Wimbledon before Sampras started dominating it in 1993. The AO is out of the question considering Sampras himself only won 2 AO's, and I still don't think either of them would win a USO although that would be their best chance.
     
    #10
  11. power level 800

    power level 800 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    676
    Location:
    Orlando
    ... but Isner isn't using the fancy lux strings that you mentioned. and as for racket technology well, he's using a racket that is 100% graphite, the same exact composite material of Philippoussis prestige's. :-?
     
    #11
  12. Romismak

    Romismak Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2011
    Messages:
    294
    Agree that racquet technology wasn´t as good, but it wouldn´t made such difference, Ivo´s serve is more about placement - thanks to his height he can hit those spots and he would use SV, go to the net - i think Ivo would benefit on faster surfaces without so many rallies. So i would give him little chance at Wimbledon

    Isner- well his kick serve probably woudn´t be so effective but with his big FH he can hit through anybody on faster HC - so i would still give him little chance at USO

    Raonic-he would suffer mostly at serve - he is using new racquets and he is hitting hardest 1st serves regularly, but his style of games suits 90s and has the power, can go to the net and his serve would be still among best, so would give him chance at USO or Wimbledon.

    About chances to win slam -Raonic actually has bigger chance in future with nobody from his generatinos with sch big weapons so i am confident he will win in future slam

    Isner- he won´t win slam in future, don´t believe it and his chance in 90s would be little bit higher in 90s at USO

    Ivo- his chance in this era was always 0% basically without serve he is by far worst, but he can volley well and he would love to play in era with less rallies, faster surfaces and he would be scary at old grass at his best serving days - that means high FS% + million aces and unreturnables - he can win vs anybody in tie-breaks if serving well

    So i would give Ivo and John little chance to win Wimbledon and USO, while Milos probably had bigger chance in future, but he would have chances in 90s to
     
    #12
  13. BauerAlmeida

    BauerAlmeida Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2012
    Messages:
    566
    Location:
    Argentina
    Raonic WILL win a slam, that's for sure IMO.

    In the 90's Isner would have the biggest chances from those.
     
    #13
  14. Federer20042006

    Federer20042006 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2012
    Messages:
    2,173
    Not a chance. Nobody even close to as one dimensional as those guys ever won a slam in the 90s.
     
    #14
  15. Gonzo_style

    Gonzo_style Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2012
    Messages:
    3,897
    Safin was "busy" the night before final :)
     
    #15
  16. ktid

    ktid Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2012
    Messages:
    317
    If Ivanisevic struggled they would struggle even more, even if Ivanisevic's struggles were mostly mental
     
    #16
  17. 90's Clay

    90's Clay Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2012
    Messages:
    7,330
    Goran was way more talented then any 3 of those guys.. If Goran couldn't win wimbledon during the Sampras era, I fail to see how any 3 of those guys would.
     
    #17
  18. tennisplayer1993

    tennisplayer1993 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2012
    Messages:
    703
    Location:
    All Around The World
    seriously Isner and Raonic? lol... definitely not isner and raonic unless he wins a grandslam in the next few years, im writing him off too.

    karlovic just had a serve. goran was similar in terms of a very powerful serve, but goran had a much more complete game and he didn't get to win a slam until the 2001 wimbledon final.

    IMO: goran's serve probably would have been easily in the 150s with today's racket technology
     
    #18
  19. tennisplayer1993

    tennisplayer1993 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2012
    Messages:
    703
    Location:
    All Around The World
    to be honest, i was actually routing for patrick rafter that day but i'm happy goran got the fairytale ending of a career. can't help but smile and feel happy for him that day. Wimbledon 2001 is still one of my favorite matches of all time.
     
    #19

Share This Page