wrist snap continued

Discussion in 'Tennis Tips/Instruction' started by TheLambsheadrep, Dec 27, 2012.

  1. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    This was the last post on the other thread:
    "I didn't say anything about flexion or extension. Forgot to mention them.
    They are in the mix too.

    I didn't say there is 'no order'. The order and degree can be forced intentionally with muscle control or you can force the order with the setup in the takeback and just 'letting it happen in the order you intended ' or you can just let it rip and see what happens however I think most people control what happens with one of the 1st 2 methods.
    It depends on the player and the situation.

    I'm not a coach and have no experience teaching tennis children but I would suspect there is more of a structured swing plan implemented for them.

    You can accomplish the same type of shot many different ways. I can hit a high heavy topspin cc shot several ways. I can use forearm pronation early or late or almost no pronation or utilizing isr for the spin or use a very steep low to high swing with x amount of deviation or a more level swing with y amount of deviation and z amount of pronation or using a pretty locked hitting structure with a ww or with a semi straight arm and wristing it with a whippy type swing etc.
    It just depends on how i'm feeling or how i'm hitting that day or how well my legs are moving and how much time i have to set up etc.

    I don't think there's a set preferred order. But maybe some coaches on here will tell you otherwise. It's simple and yet complicated which is why many of us spend a lot of time here discussing such things."

    I just got back from Christmas vacation, and hope everyone had a Merry Christmas or happy holidays. Since I just got back, I will need to look over the last post again, but I did want to say that when teaching children, there is a structured swing plan but it's broken down into steps. Trying to explain the whole swing in one motion or lecture will get a coach nowhere, so we - take the main points of the swing, give them a catchy name (depending on the age of the student) so they specifically remember to include it in the process, and let the student blend them all together. At first it is robotic since it's a step-by-step process, but it eventually becomes natural because there was an order initially given. If there are pronations and other movements that are certainly always involved in the "correct" way to swing, my mind goes to the step-by-step coaching method that allows a student to understand when they occur.

    I am just trying to understand when all of these movements are meant to take place. I understand that unless you are in the same position, time the ball the same, and hit in the same direction all the time, there will be variations in the swing. I know I can't ask someone to break down every type of shot since one can argue that there are infinite shots, but I was just hoping for a generalization.
     
    #1
  2. gregor.b

    gregor.b Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2009
    Messages:
    1,202
    Location:
    Brisvegas
    DO NOT try to explain any of that stuff to children. They will soon come to associate tennis with chores or even worse learning and lose interest. As for your dilemma, have you thought about physical training rather than theorizing?

    You will find it works much more effectively and the body does automatically compensate after a small period to adjust to what the mind is telling it.

    For example, it you are hitting the ball too short with too much spin, make the stroke LONGER for more depth, don't hit it harder as you will create more racquet head speed and spin and it will drop shorter. If you are hitting too long, try coming a LITTLE more low to high.

    The body will do what you tell it to. It may take a while to become automatic, but the body is a pretty clever unit. Trust it.
     
    #2
  3. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113

    I would not teach this to kids, it would go WAY over their heads haha. This is for me to understand when I should aim to willingly pronate/perform arm movements during the forward acceleration
     
    #3
  4. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    So, I haven’t given this subject a lot of thought since I started this new thread, but I recorded my strokes last week and watching them has been eye opening. It is something everyone should do, and should pretty much be a requirement to talk on the subject (I know this would have made it easier for me to understand what myself and others were talking about). When I talk about my video I know I am by no means a pro, I am a rusty 4.0 at best, but I am seeing some good stuff here and want to ramble about it :)



    Now that I have seen my shots on video, I can say that the pronation in the take back is mostly natural for me (I am training myself to do it on every shot) and the pronation in the follow through is totally natural. I was having a hard time grasping the follow through pronation before, thinking it was a physical step in the swing and wondering when to implement it. But during the filming of the strokes, I didn’t think about doing it even once. One of the reasons I wanted to make the video was to see how my follow through generally ends up, and I got to view that plus see THAT THIS HAS TO BE WHY IT APPEARS THAT THE PROS ARE INTENTIONALLY SNAPPING THEIR WRISTS. Again, I am not a pro by any means but I saw a lot of good and natural tennis motions I didn’t necessarily know I was doing in my video, including the biomechanical signs of the SSC.

    On another topic, a post by 1HBH Rocks said (referring to Fed and Nadal) said “The reason they hit with a straight arm is that they perform an arm extension in their take back while they pronate their forearm a bit.” I see truth in this when watching my video, even though it is not always the full case with the pros or me. A lot of slow motion analysis shows that Fed and Nadal don’t have the most radical take back pronations and hit with straight arms, while pros that do have pretty radical take back pronations (Nadal, Wawrinka off the top of my head) have bent arms and pros with little, if any, take back pronations (Murray, Blake, Agassi) have bent arms as well. To try to build on this, I attempted to find a correlation between how parallel the racquet face gets to the court before the forward swing and if it results in a straight/bent arm swing, but found no real pattern. Could grip or footwork have something to do with it, I do not know. As for me, on some of my shots I have a straight arm and on others I don’t, and I’m not seeing a great reason as to why. I thought it could have been about the height of the oncoming ball, but there is not enough consistency to say that is so. The most apparent thing I see (and this should also be common sense) is that when I took the ball early, I almost always had a straight arm as I am reaching for the ball, but the opposite could not be said about late/close to the feet shots. Anyway, I found this interesting and will continue to look into it.
     
    #4
  5. user92626

    user92626 Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    6,142

    The pronations being natural were also my experience and observation, too. That's why in another thread I was saying to ignore it. Focusing on pronation or rotation as a physical step to do would likely be detrimental and confusing.
     
    #5
  6. TheCheese

    TheCheese Professional

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    953
    All this talk about the forehand and pronation, blah blah blah lately has gotten out of hand.

    Someone should just make a video and SHOW what they're talking about.
     
    #6
  7. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    I will try to get some forehands on youtube today
     
    #7
  8. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdSWqlFGHqE&feature=youtu.be

    here is something I had filmed about a week ago while NC was in the 50s-70s, and it's a good thing I did because everything outside is now coated in ice.

    the video is mainly forehands, but I have done a lot of good reflection and realization from it. the slow-mo and stop motion break down is at 2:28, but I hope you will look at all the whole video and comment on the strokes.

    Even though I didn't make the video for or against the wrist snap argument specifically, I feel that I can now decide for myself. As I stated in post #4 here, if you are swinging anything like the pros (and I'm not claiming to be), there is minimal to no intentional wrist movement. I can honestly say that I was just swinging through the ball, no intentional wrist flicking, radial deviation, or anything of the sort. I do think there are some exceptions (see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdNMKAT3k10 at 38 seconds, for example. it's hard to fathom that much forearm speed and the follow through without wrist action), but they are mainly from bad positioning or bad foot work.

    I also mentioned that the proper follow through pronation, with no voluntary wrist action, was due to the stretch shortening cycle based on Solat's explanation (post #6 at http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=112708) and other readings. I have really been focusing lately on getting the racquet face that will make contact to face behind me on the take back, as mentioned in talks about the SSC and performed by many top pros (to varying degrees). In many of my shots I see that the racquet is making between a 45 and 90 degree angle with my forearm right before contact, so I just want to make sure this is evidence of the SSC and that's it's helped by the racquet face facing behind me. Also, I noticed that Murray doesn't have much of a racquet face turn back at all, but at the lowest part of his back swing his contact strings are facing down and parallel to the ground. What does this accomplish, and how does it effect SSC?

    Without getting too deep into another dividing topic, I did lead up the main racquet of the video to 383 grams, 7.5 pts HL, and SW of 365, so without the calculations in front of me i think the Mgr/I is just under 21. It feels absolutely awesome, and like the video convinced me the wrist is not active, I am also convinced there is something to Mgr/I. By the way, the racquet is a Ti. Carbon 5001, and the strings are the FACTORY SYNTHETIC. That's right, I haven't changed out the strings yet, and I am still getting great results with spin, accuracy, and consistency. Can't wait to get some kevlar in there
     
    #8
  9. Cheetah

    Cheetah Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    3,847
    Location:
    San Diego
    i haven't played around with mgr/i yet. everytime i read up on it i give up because of all the banter back and forth and i get confused.
    what have you noticed with it?

    swing path looks good i guess. you should really work on it though. you're wasting a lot of energy and it's not repeatable due to your stance and footwork. and your stroke won't hold up against a heavy ball from say for example.. me. haha.

    what grip is that? looks like a mild eastern.
     
    #9
  10. Cheetah

    Cheetah Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    3,847
    Location:
    San Diego
    also, your pronation is not because of the ssc. it's because you have a decent swing path and your arm is relatively loose. in that case your arm has no choice but to pronate. You have almost no ssc going on. close to zero because of your takeback and setup just before going forward. couple of issues there. I could explain if you want me to.
     
    #10
  11. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    after optimizing Mgr/I, I've been able to play more consistently and feel like I still hit with solid contact outside of my strike zone. The optimal number is good and all, but I think people think too much about it, and I believe the reason there's debate is because people don't think there's a magic number. It's really about what gets you to that number - the weight, the balance, and the swing weight. In order to have a relevant optimized number (this is also an argument against it - you can get the/your optimized number with various combinations of weight, balance, and SW using calculus to figure out the individual numbers on a curve. Someone did this and sound they could get Mgr/I to 21 with like a 6oz racquet or something, and while you can, it should be obvious that's not the point), you need a pretty hefty stick - I couldnt get the Mgr/I around 21 without the weight being over 13oz. That weight is going to make the shots feel more solid. Then, you need a pretty HL balance, which makes the racquet swingable. The last thing also turns people off - you'll need a pretty high SW, but that comes with the territory of a high weight to begin with. The high SW is free power and stablizes the racquet against a heavy ball (such as yours :p ). All in all, it's the combination of racquet characteristics that get that magic optimized number, not the other way around. I def recommend to anyone to try it.

    Where am I wasting energy? And during matches and even just hitting for fun when I'm being moved around I def get more of a knee bend and better foot work going. This was a casual session, but yes, foot work is very important to start the kinetic chain, so thanks for lookin' out for me haha. And I've rallied against many a heavy ball, is that a challenge? :twisted:

    Oh, and I use a semi western forehand
     
    #11
  12. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    I would appreciate that, always up for getting better. Was I wrong in understanding Solat's explanation of the SSC? Or was he wrong...?
     
    #12
  13. Cheetah

    Cheetah Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    3,847
    Location:
    San Diego
    lemme finish my lasagna and i'll get back to you in a bit
     
    #13
  14. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    No rush, people should have many better things to do then rush to help me haha. Thanks in advance
     
    #14
  15. Cheetah

    Cheetah Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    3,847
    Location:
    San Diego
    well...

    I was going to say a lot about your footwork and stance but you said you were being casual so i'll give you the benefit of the doubt there.

    you do a lot of things pretty well actually. swing path is great. you just don't do all the good things together. meaning on some swings your contact point is good but rotation is off. or pronation is good but extension is lacking etc.

    your takeback is too far back which is why your not getting good ssc. you take the racquet all the way back and there it becomes disconnected from your rotation so you have to use your arm to do all the work. lots of players have a long takeback like that but they use the arm muscles to move the arm ahead while the torso is rotating and then when it's caught up to the correct spot then the torso and arm is in sync and move together as a unit.

    but you do your take back and you rotate but you can see while you are rotating your arm catches up and passes your rotation. they never move together. you can really see it on the side view at the end. your arm goes right past your body. you're loosing a lot of oomph right there.

    just to get the feel you might want to try making your takeback much shorter. just for experimenting make it very short like fed's. it will feel uncomfortable but try it for like 20 strokes. once you figure out how to make contact like that you will see you will have much more power. Then you can adjust things to your liking.

    If your takeback is shorter then when you rotate your arm will have 'room to breath' and will be pulled by the rotation and there it will stretch and give you the ssc action.

    Also the djokovic-like takeback you are doing is not good for your grip style. That kind of takeback is natural for a more extreme grip because that is the natural path it will take while maintaining a 'neutral wrist' position during the takeback and it will lay the racquet flat (pat the dog) at the end of the takeback. With your grip, doing that takeback puts tension (whether u are aware of it or not) in your wrist and it doesn't let you get into a pat the dog position thereby robbing you of ssc and potential topspin. look at the face of your racquet at the end of the takeback. not so good.
    You might want to try copying the takeback of a pro that has a semi western grip.

    Your topspin. so so haha. you get some good spin sometimes but when you do i can see you really have to work for it. Your topspin is good but it's not biting and there is no sidespin component on it. I'm guessing you hit a lot of balls long. it doesn't have to be that way. In addition to the above mentioned stuff you might want to make contact about 3 or 4 or so more inches out in front. your contact point is good and it's well out in front but if you move it out a little more then it will be at the point just before your racquet starts moving to the side and also where your wrist starts to deviate. currently your racquet is going thru it a little more than i'd like. That way you'll get more natural spin with sidespin and also you'll be able to generate a lot more because your wrist will naturally be turning at that point so you'll be able to give it a bit more manually right there w/o doing funky arm movements. it will be more natural. plus you'll be able to swing harder because the harder you swing the more your wrist will be moving right at that sweet spot. just a couple of inches. it will be hard to make the adjustments but it will work.

    ... and dump the closed stance lol.
     
    Last edited: Jan 25, 2013
    #15
  16. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    Thanks for all of that. I'm off to bed soon so I will take this in, digest it tonight, and get back to the thread tomorrow. Speaking of which, how was your lasagna?

    And just curious, do you do any coaching?
     
    #16
  17. Cheetah

    Cheetah Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    3,847
    Location:
    San Diego
    it was yummy thanks.
    not a coach. just been playing since i was 4. lots of lessons. tennis freak. etc.
     
    #17
  18. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    Nice. I went to a SUNY college with a D3 program, and the same semester I was offered a spot on the team I got a job as an RA. After dual Bio and Anth degrees plus the gf (that's a major time commitment in itself), I had room essentially for doing one or the other, and D3 tennis doesn't pay the bills. I still hit with friends that were on the team, and that was good enough for me at the time.

    But now it really is time for bed, so another thank you for tonight and I will post again tomorrow
     
    #18
  19. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    #19
  20. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    As the racquet is brought up from the neutral position (for a forehand) for the initial part of the back swing, Nadal, Federer, Novak, Murray, Blake, and Agassi all do have a bend in the elbow. Sometimes it lasts for only a second before straightening out, sometimes it lasts the entire stroke. Even sometimes the elbow bend is initially present, and then the arm becomes straight at some point, then right before contact the elbow bends again (Murray). I see that I also have a bend at first, but the motion to stretch out my arm up and toward the back fence gets rid of it quickly. Sitting here right now, I can feel the difference between keeping my elbow bent for a long time vs a short time on the take back – the long time motion is dictated by the arm/forearm, and I can feel the rotation of the racquet is more compact as it goes around my elbow like an upside down pendulum. The short time motion is dictated by my shoulder, which produces that higher-reaching and loopier back swing, and unless I willingly pull my elbow in to make it bend (which I would think is not good technique, but how does Murray do it?), it doesn’t seem to bend again. So take back dictated by the elbow is good, while by the shoulder is bad…?


    I can see from the video that the pro with the closest initial backswing to mine definitely is Novak (I’ll explain why down below), and he has the head of the racquet level with his head most of the time, half way over his head at best, when he brings it up from the neutral position for a forehand. I’m assuming that keeping the racquet head lower forces him to have a prolonged elbow bend or vice versa. I see that I’m getting the whole head of the racquet over my head sometimes if not most times. So I’ll make keeping the racquet head at my head level a habit. I do see, thought, that Novak outstretches his arm back horizontally about the same as I do (sometimes I do more, sometime he does), but so does Murray, Blake, and Agassi (Agassi seems to get the racquet head over his head quite a bit, too). I think I’m seeing Federer to it a fair amount as well, but maybe not as often. Nadal almost appears to do straight down drop of the arm to about 45 degrees, so he’s the outlier in this group. So is having the arm stretched back near horizontal fine, and is having the take back from your elbow, not the shoulder, the way to doing it correctly?


    The pronation of the racquet back early in the back swing was something I saw from a Jeff Salzenstein video on youtube about Novak’s take back and thought I’d try it out. I can see what you’re saying about tension because I have to force it - since I would say until I tried the technique from that video I was taking the racquet back more like Murray (the first 13 seconds of my video is more like I used to hit before trying the Novak turn), who looks like he implements very little pronation on the take back (especially early in the take back, but he does get the racquet face parallel to the ground at the lowest point of the back swing which requires pronation). This also occurs with Blake and Agassi, and if I have read correct information, all three of them used the SW grip. It would make sense if that was the case, but in rallies I feel I have been able to generate more topspin pronating back like Novak does. I know Agassi and Blake both could generate good topspin but were more known as flat hitters, is that the case with Murray (I don’t follow him as much)? How are the three of them able to go from flat to topspin without the drastic Novak pronation, is late pronation (like Murray) and not early pronation (like Novak) the key for a SW forehand? Is the tension created with the Novak pronation what’s cutting down on my ssc (even though I am seeing my wrist back before contact, I’m guessing there needs to be more than that and the wrist bend isn’t the only sign of the ssc)?
     
    Last edited: Jan 26, 2013
    #20
  21. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    I will post on the topspin stuff later, this took a while haha
     
    #21
  22. Cheetah

    Cheetah Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    3,847
    Location:
    San Diego
    funny you should mention murray. i was going to list him last night as sort of an exception. his forehand is kind of unique. his wrist at the end of the takeback is not in a neutral position which is why he doesn't get the racquet flip at the and and it's one reason he has less topspin than others. however he does bend the arm earlier than you said. it's hard to tell in the vid you posted. look at these vids. If you freeze it you can see he bends right away after the first forward movement. Then the ssc kicks in and his arm catches up. By contact his arm and body are in sync and make contact as a unit. These are great vids of murray. His swing looks great here.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YerH0-8n_0w

    Yes, but look how they get the racquet in ptd. You don't do that. Your wrist is kind of locked in place. Plus look how loose their wrist is. The racquet flies back as they start going forward. this is the stretch that throws the racquet forward.

    Also look at their upper arm from the shoulder to the elbow. This area stays with the torso the whole time. This is important. The torso rotates, the upper arm moves with it and the loose forearm and wrist lags behind. This pull creates the stretch and it 'catches up' just before contact. Your upper arm moves before your torso on it's own then your torso rotates but your arm is moving independently and passes your torso. It's 'disconnected'.

    The vid you posted of Novac is not indicative of his match play form. I think he was just starting to warm up there. This video here is better and more closely matches his match form. Notice his wrist is in a neutral position during takeback. It's not flexed, extended or deviated and because of his grip is goes up high and twisted like that. But his wrist is totally neutral. Also notice his upper arm stays with the torso during the forward swing.
    This is what people mean when they say 'lead with the elbow'. The elbow moves forward ahead of the wrist during the swing. The wrist and racquet lag behind. Then when rotation slows and/or is facing the net the forearm is 'whipped' around to contact. It's more like a whip type action. Not really a 'push' or a 'swing'.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWOVWARCxbU

    Yes i know that video. I disagree with it. But I love Jeff. If you look at pros the only ones who have that kind of takeback are players with an extreme semi grip. I have the same grip. Nishikori has that grip and takeback also. You won't be able to find a semi-western or eastern grip pro w/ that takeback.

    You need to have the face slightly higher than the wrist and pointing more to the side fence. usually at a 45degree ish angle. This position will cause the racquet to flip down and back when you move forward. Look at all those vids. They all get the face into this position just before going forward. Your racquet points directly to the backfence and is not facing the ground so all of that potential ssc is killed right there.

    go to virtualtennisacademy.com. sign up. it's free. then watch the 'millenium forehand' video. it's great. he goes into this step by step and he's and atp/wta coach. Watch that vid and also read his forehand article.
     
    Last edited: Jan 26, 2013
    #22
  23. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    this is another slow mo video I watched of Murray and should have posted the first time http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5guJYUKgd0 you can see the bend-straight-bend right from the first forehand.

    I'm going to look over your Novak video tonight, thanks for that. I am also going to sign up for that website and post back on what I learn. Btw, Murray does have a SW forehand like Agassi and Blake, correct? Should the fact that his stroke is "an exception" discourage me from trying to learn from it? He would be a more modern example of what I could be doing, where Agassi has more of a classic stroke. Blake tends to lean toward Agassi with strokes I think, too. Any other good SW players that you think I should study based on my video?
     
    #23
  24. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    I do want to talk about top spin like I said before, but I have been thinking about this today - for the initial part of the short take back, would you say that you are trying to perform an external rotation of the shoulder with or without incorporating elbow movement? In the pro videos I linked in the thread plus others available, during their take backs I can't tell 100% if even the same player will always try to make the racquet follow a pendulum motion (approximately, and from external rotation of the shoulder) up with the elbow acting like the fixed point/pivot point (being stationary as much as possible, any motion backward is from body rotation), or if the elbow is being pulled back (elbow in the gut motion, going however much or little they want the elbow back) as external rotation of the shoulder still takes place. In short - as the racquet goes up and back during the initial part of the take back via the shoulder, should the elbow also help bring the racquet back and then down?

    Also, even though this is not quoted, I'm gonna mention neutral stance. I see Fed has it a lot in casual hitting, and I think I do it more when being casual too, but I have a feeling he opens up a lot more than I do in real play. It's just a habit of mine, but I think it also plays a part in limiting ssc - with a more open stance, you can load up the back/outside foot and twist the body, letting the uncoiling of the body whip the forehand around to contact. In my video, I'm seeing that I am facing sideways which is good, but have little to no coiling. I am going to work on coiling sideways instead of just facing sideways, I think that should help, right?
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2013
    #24
  25. Cheetah

    Cheetah Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    3,847
    Location:
    San Diego
    I don't understand what you're saying in the 1st paragraph. Are you sure you're talking about external shoulder rotation? Maybe you can word it differently.
    Also this is addressed in the video on the site i told you about.

    Yes you don't coil in your strokes. you just turn sideways. the shoulders should be turned more than the hips.
    You should be getting power from the body and control from the arm. maybe about 70/30 or even 80/20 body/arm
     
    #25
  26. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    I will check the website and get back to you, I know it came out really confusing but it's just how I saw it in my head.

    Btw, I think TheCheese answered a question I had on what determines a shot being straight armed or bent. This is what he said and how I responded (my response has to do with how you guessed I hit balls long. I don't do it often when I go for topspin, but sometimes when I flatten a shot out it takes off):

    TheCheese - What is important is whether you are using pronation vs supination in the transition between the takeback and forward swing.


    Me - TheCheese, that makes perfect sense actually. You saw on my video how much I was pronating on the take back, plus this is confirmed by pro slow mo videos, so thanks!

    I was wondering before this if supination from bad timing and/ or bad technique was causing some of my seemed-to-be regular shots to hit the back fence once in a while. After watching the video (9 seconds in) it appears that it's just me getting too under the ball and swinging across my body, which seems to create an upwards swing path. Could supination still have a hand in this?
     
    #26
  27. Cheetah

    Cheetah Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    3,847
    Location:
    San Diego
    you're position @ :09s looks pretty good. I think they were launched because of the face angle at contact. swing path is fine. this is one reason i think you hit too late. if contact was made more out in front there would have more brushing action. You should also try to work on closing the racquet face. That would happen naturally if you used your body to bring the racquet around instead of your arm because if you notice if you pause it at 09s the racquet is in the correct position. face is closed. buttcap pointed. if you would have just rotated keeping that structure then that would have been a good hit.

    now i now why i thought you had a conservative grip.
    Here's a good tip: change your grip style. That grip style you are using is not the best for the type of swing you are going for. I'm not talking about semiwestern/eastern etc. semi is fine. I'm referring to the way you hold your semi.
    I highly recommend you grip the racquet all the way down to the end of the buttcap and don't spread your fingers the way you are doing. The way you are holding it is more conducive to an old school neutral stance linear swing powered by the arm. You are choking up and your fingers are spread.

    If you hold the racquet all the way at the bottom with the heel pad actually extending past the buttcap in more of a fist like grip you get noticeably more racquet head speed, spin, pronation and deviation. Just try like 20 shadow swings with it. You will feel uncomfortable for a bit like you have no control. but after a few swings you will adjust as you will see that the racquet moves more freely and most importantly the racquet face will move in a more direct correspondence to how your hand moves. it will mirror what your hand does better than what you are doing now. Hard to explain but it gives more control with less effort (provided you don't arm the ball). You just have to adapt a little and figure out where to put the pressure. Also this grip let's the wrist flex more. the handle doesn't get in the way. So if you wanted u could give a touch of flex for some extra power on some shots. but if don't want to flex the wrist then this grip forces / encourages you to swing with more body so that the wrist stays laid back at contact without you having to manually hold the wrist back with tension. It stays loose. It's a much better grip imo.

    If you look at the pros almost all of them hold the racquet all the down and even a little past the buttcap (exceptions would be verdasco) and they all hold it more in a fist type shape. Give it a try.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2013
    #27
  28. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    I will check this out, thanks again! Btw, I went to the website but the pages are giving me problems, is this the same article? http://www.tennisforum.com/showthread.php?t=70102
     
    #28
  29. Cheetah

    Cheetah Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    3,847
    Location:
    San Diego
    #29
  30. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    I was able to make an account, but when I click login or any of the other links I get blank pages. I will delete my cookies and keep trying
     
    #30
  31. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    Real quick - what's ptd.? And I've been watching more videos, and pros with a large double bend seem to have little to no scc. here's one good example when you break it into slow motion http://www.tennisplayer.net/public/...chive_sample_archive.html?AAFHCenterSide1.mov . I'd say it's because the forearm is not "dead" and left hanging to get whipped up to speed, and because it seems that with a double bend the arm above the elbow and the shoulders/torso move as one unit, essentially removing the top half (and starting half) of the whip. Am I just seeing this because it's two in the morning?haha
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2013
    #31
  32. Cheetah

    Cheetah Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    3,847
    Location:
    San Diego
    pat the dog.

    nope. they have a lot of ssc. it's not related to how much or what type of bend they have.

    agassi's form is old school. pros don't hit like that today.
    agassi's spin rate is less than half of what pros get now.

    monfils http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkUSTi4U7Io
    kohlschreiber http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9cR_S7jakA
    djoko http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8AJYfkJ4hc
    tsonga http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1uQcr6xSvs
    li na http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yL1Gt3vfeac
    ryan harrison http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mxg_qBTuq4U
    nishikori http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do3-geZv9WQ
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2013
    #32
  33. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    Ok, Agassi was prob the wrong pro to check out since we're in the realm of modern tennis, my bad. It does look to me, though, like the more bent/tucked in the elbow remains throughout the back swing, the less ssc there is (which I would think means it's somewhat grip related. Hopefully I'll be right on some part of this and not go 0 for 100 haha)
     
    #33
  34. Cheetah

    Cheetah Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    3,847
    Location:
    San Diego
    western grip kohlscreiber http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9cR_S7jakA
    eastern grip fed http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCm6OIjbPr4

    opposite ends of the grip spectrum. both have extreme ssc.
    it's not related to grip. it's position in set up and loose arm/wrist
     
    #34
  35. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    But Fed goes straight arm, so an eastern with a straight arm forehand may be an exception of grip since any grip with a straight arm forehand still has full extension of the elbow away from the body. I could be more specific and just say it looks like the more bent/tucked in the elbow remains throughout the back swing, the less ssc there appears to be, is that more accurate? Or is that still too much of a classic stroke mindset?
     
    #35
  36. Cheetah

    Cheetah Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    3,847
    Location:
    San Diego
    #36
  37. Cheetah

    Cheetah Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    3,847
    Location:
    San Diego
    #37
  38. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    What about http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CrWFui1jW4

    and I think this is very similar your first tsonga video with more of his early stroke http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VVCiegIGQY I see the wrist gets good whip, but not seeing the same from his forearm (which looks to me like it moves right with the arm above the elbow, which is moving right with the shoulder). the second video describes what I was saying before about half the whip being gone - I know he's crushing the ball but it looks like it's bc the power from his leg push off (he's getting ups!). His arm's kinda lookin' like a dolphin flipper to me there. Either way, this would only be one modern forehand example of what I was saying, so maybe, maybe not
     
    #38
  39. Cheetah

    Cheetah Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    3,847
    Location:
    San Diego
    he doesn't get in ptd position and he also doesn't pronate much. that's why.
     
    #39
  40. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    I am going to hit against the wall again tomorrow and take it up a notch above casual. Like I said before, I believe I do open my stance up and get the knees bent more in a real point (you can find plenty of vids with pros warming up and having very neutral/easy going strokes), but if I want to make these adjustments into real point habits, you gotta play like they're real points. Based on what we've discussed, I'm assuming you would agree that an open stance gives me better upper body rotation potential, and that should help eliminate the fence ball like what 09s would have been.

    Btw, I got the video links working on virtualtennisacademy, so I'll be watching the millennium movie after my next post or two
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2013
    #40
  41. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    When I grab my racquet naturally with a SW grip and extend the wrist back, the end of the butt cap is even with the base of my heel pad. I also develop this linear brown-ish callus after not playing for a bit www.flickr.com/photos/38221599@N05/8425193187

    what do you mean by "neutral stance linear swing?" I imagine it's an accurate description since you also say it's powered by the arm (and my arm does most of the swinging in the casual neutral stance), I just can't picture it with only those four words
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2013
    #41
  42. Cheetah

    Cheetah Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    3,847
    Location:
    San Diego
    #42
  43. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    I've bookmarked that before, great video
    Real quick, this was from earlier in the thread:

    Murray does have a SW forehand like Agassi and Blake, correct? Should the fact that his stroke is "an exception" discourage me from trying to learn from it? He would be a more modern example of what I could be doing, where Agassi has more of a classic stroke. Blake tends to lean toward Agassi with strokes I think, too. Any other good SW players that you think I should study based on my video?
     
    #43
  44. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    From the first paragraph, I see you examples and I can always look at more, but would you say should I be going from what I'm using to getting my pinky level with the bottom of the butt cap and make a fist, or maybe keep where my hand is but bring my fingers closer together to make a fist (the pointer finger is def spaced the farthest out, but I'm seeing that in the pics you posted, Nadal's being the most obvious)? With the way I'm holding the racquet now, the slope of the butt cap up to the rest of the grip fits so nice into my pad/palm, it was just a comfort thing that I've always used.

    And can you comment on the second paragraph please
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2013
    #44
  45. Cheetah

    Cheetah Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    3,847
    Location:
    San Diego
    i think agassi's grip is an eastern / sw hybrid.

    hard to say who else. swings and grips are extensions of personalities.
    tipsarevic has a simple easy to copy style and has all the modern elements.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-R3PJaev3AA
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13N2TOH7Kwg
     
    #45
  46. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    OK, seeing the pinky level with the bottom of the butt cap in the vast majority of photos, even Agassi's.

    So prob more than a pinky width up from the butt cap to flush with the butt cap. I bet that's what you were going to say Cheetah :p
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2013
    #46
  47. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    Tipsy's stroke is similar to mine from that first video at least, even more so when I keep the back swing closer to me. Is he SW grip though, he's turning that contact face of the racquet pretty far back...

    Is he modeling the Western backhand as well...? http://tennis.about.com/od/forehandbackhand/ss/bh2gripclosewt_3.htm
    I was going to post another thread on this at some point, trying to get more info before I put it together
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2013
    #47
  48. Cheetah

    Cheetah Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    3,847
    Location:
    San Diego
    not sure of his grip actually and i don't know much about 2 hand backhands.
     
    #48
  49. TheLambsheadrep

    TheLambsheadrep Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,113
    Cheeta, I was only free to try out some of your (and other's) suggestions for like 15 min yesterday, but I was able to begin to feel how different everything will be (especially the lower grip placement). I knew I didn't have much time and wasn't hitting great full distance strokes with all the new steps in my head, so I decided to try some short court. The big take away of the night was this- I was able to hit controlled topspin in a short court scenario. Normally when I do short court, I just poke at the ball. A lot of slice forehands and some flat softies, but I am never able to hit a topspin forehand in the manageable way warming up short court style intends. Against a wall is never a tell-all compared to hitting with a person, but I was taking full swings and seeing that the ball wasn't hit too hard (which is the biggest problem for me with short court topspin forehands. I feel other players of my level hit easy, arching strokes with obvious topspin that could land in the middle of the box. If I could get it over with topspin and not have it look linear and land deep in the box, it was probably a mishit haha).

    I'm hoping this increase of controlled, short distance topspin will carry over somehow to my full court game. Just the first thing to fall into place :)
     
    Last edited: Jan 30, 2013
    #49
  50. Cheetah

    Cheetah Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    3,847
    Location:
    San Diego
    cool. told ya so. that grip has more feel, more spin and more power because it helps you keep a loose wrist.
     
    #50

Share This Page