Yes, CONNORS is top 10 of all time--READ BELOW

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by Connors, Jun 5, 2008.

  1. Connors

    Connors Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2006
    Messages:
    330
    -139 singles titles won--that's ONE HUNDRED THIRTY NINE!!

    -1337 match wins--most ever

    -82% winning record

    -8 Grand Slam titles--don't forget, I did not play Australian Open hardly at all

    -7 Grand Slam finals

    -counting season ending Masters', TWENTY-THREE semi-finals (that's 23)

    -10 Grand Slam Quarterfinals

    ***268 weeks at Number One. Over 300 weeks at #2 or #3--THAT MEANS JIMMY CONNORS WAS IN THE TOP THREE FOR WELL OVER 11 YEARS!!!!

    --semifinalist at US Open in '91 at age 39.

    People who don't realize my accomplishments or appreciate what I've done haven't studied the history of the game. To say I'm not top 10 indicates your stupidity.
     
    Last edited: Jun 5, 2008
    #1
  2. Vision84

    Vision84 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Messages:
    1,655
    Location:
    Cambridge, UK
    Are you really Jimmy Connors? If not then go away troll.

    Besides as I have said many times to many variables across generations to come up with a decent list of GOAT players.
     
    #2
  3. Connors

    Connors Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2006
    Messages:
    330
    So...who are you, Mr. Tennis Warehouse? I could give a crap what you think.
     
    #3
  4. Phil

    Phil Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    3,877
    Location:
    In a tent, along the Silk Road
    Anyone who knows anything about tennis puts JC in the top 10 (or top 5) GOAT's. So this is kind of a stupid-waste-of-time-post on your part, "Jimmy".
     
    #4
  5. Vision84

    Vision84 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Messages:
    1,655
    Location:
    Cambridge, UK
    If you are in fact Jimmy Connors like you claim in your post then you have nothing to be insulted about from my post.
     
    #5
  6. TennisLover17

    TennisLover17 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2008
    Messages:
    420
    Lol 1337. what a coincidence
     
    #6
  7. love means nothing

    love means nothing New User

    Joined:
    May 10, 2008
    Messages:
    21
    connors also missed the french 5 years and only played the aussie twice, and the us open was on clay 3 years. so he could have had many more slams, too.

    statistically, he rates very high.
     
    #7
  8. spiritdragon

    spiritdragon Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2007
    Messages:
    297
    lol, i was gonna say the same thing. i dont feel like looking it up but it would be funny if it really was true.
     
    #8
  9. Lendl and Federer Fan

    Lendl and Federer Fan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2008
    Messages:
    2,326
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Shouldn't this belong to the "Former Pro Player Talk" section? :)
     
    #9
  10. Rhino

    Rhino Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2005
    Messages:
    7,475
    Location:
    South of London, west of Moscow
    It's all about the majors Jimmy. Roger could easily clock up 1337 match wins if he played more tournaments. I mean if he bothered, he could win Newport 10 years in a row for instance, but people only remember Grand slam singles titles so why bother?
     
    #10

Share This Page