As the title says, give your own points system for all the ATP tournaments. But don't mess with the designations. The Grand Slams should all have equal rating points just like all the Masters from the same tier have equal rating points. You could even award more points for winning a Masters tournament than for winning a Grand Slam but that's at your own risk. Reasons for a certain points-system would be nice but not necessary. Anyway, here's mine : GRAND SLAMS Champion - 2500 Final - 1500 Semifinal - 900 Quarterfinal - 600 4th Round - 400 3rd Round - 200 2nd Round - 100 1st Round - 50 (including qualifying points) ATP WTF 200 points for each RR win 400 points for a semifinal win 600 points for a final win MASTERS (1000) Winner - 1000 Final - 600 Semifinal - 360 Quarterfinal - 200 4th Round - 120 3rd Round - 60 2nd Round - 30 1st Round - 10 (including qualifying points) Use the same ratios for the MASTERS 500, 250 as for the MASTERS 1000. Olympics - 0 points You play the Olympics for your country, and for your pride, not for ranking points or money. I think giving them 0 points would be more respectful than giving something like a 1000 points or a 1200 points. And it wouldn't deserve anything more for being the tournament that it is. So best not have any ranking points for it. This way you won't have skewing of ranking points every 4 years and all years will be comparable.