Talk Tennis

Talk Tennis (http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/index.php)
-   Odds & Ends (http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/forumdisplay.php?f=21)
-   -   Maria Sharapova's looks (http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=117587)

heycal 02-09-2007 03:50 PM

Maria Sharapova's looks
 
There's a hot debate raging right now in the "Reading the score" thread over Miss Sharapova's appearance, and I'd like to solicitate some other opinions. Vote here, and feel free to comment.

Andres 02-09-2007 04:21 PM

About average, to my eyes.

abenguyen 02-09-2007 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andres Guazzelli (Post 1240723)
About average, to my eyes.

well i think you need to get those eyes checked!

maverick66 02-09-2007 04:43 PM

wow u did it. i didnt think you actually would make a poll. gj for that. and i stand by my average girl who is airbrushed in everything we see except her matches where she really shows off that ten year old boy chest of hers.

LuckyR 02-09-2007 04:51 PM

Maria is an attractive young woman, but is not to Hollywood standards. Her claim to fame is that she plays tennis extremely well and has very good (not great) looks. It's the combination of both that makes her stand out, not pure looks.

Feņa14 02-09-2007 04:55 PM

1. I don't like overly tall women.
2. I don't like blonde women (much).
3. I don't like her body.
4. Shes a bit too pale for my liking.
4. She's not all that pretty in my eyes.

It's all about what you look for in a woman I suppose and Maria doesn't have anything particularly that I find attractive.

CanadianChic 02-09-2007 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Feņa14 (Post 1240783)
It's all about what you look for in a woman I suppose and Maria doesn't have anything particularly that I find attractive.

Exellent post Fena - you just backed up my stance 100 percent.

I voted that she is under par - but not unattractive.

dowjones 02-09-2007 04:59 PM

Yep, a very plain looking women!

http://69.93.50.122/desktopgirls/pho...23107PM790.jpg

Lakoste 02-09-2007 05:07 PM

She's not ugly by any means, but if she was a normal chick and was walking down the street, I wouldn't do a double-take to get a better look...
Quote:

Originally Posted by maverick66 (Post 1237650)
flat but and the chest of a ten year old boy then thats fine.

Quote:

Originally Posted by maverick66 (Post 1240741)
you can have your ten your old boy chested girl.

Quote:

Originally Posted by maverick66 (Post 1240754)
she really shows off that ten year old boy chest of hers.

Yea...I think we get your point...

Maverick's type of girl: no one can confuse this with a 10 year old boy

fed_the_savior 02-09-2007 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dowjones (Post 1240794)

^^ 2 pounds of make-up, hair done up to death. She has kind of a girlish looking face. Nice hips and legs.

I think she is what they call "marketed."

Here's your stunner: http://cache.gettyimages.com/xc/7317...7E5D58A2B85C85

But here's a pretty fair picture: http://cache.gettyimages.com/xc/7314...A7342140A0CF24

My take: slightly above average, but I vote average to balance the marketing hype.

Fee 02-09-2007 05:38 PM

I've never understood the fascination with her looks, and I wonder if she would get any attention if she was a brunette. She's looks kind of undeveloped and fish faced to me, but she has great long legs. Still, I'd take Elena Dementieva any day, now that I've seen both of them relatively close up.

Then again, Andy Roddick gets better looking every time he wins a match (so he says) so I guess there is something to be said for the 'persona' and the whole package.

OrangeOne 02-09-2007 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dowjones (Post 1240794)

To ad to f_t_s's comments, that pic is one of the most over-processed, over-photoshopped, over-airbrushed pics of a 'real person' I've ever seen. There's a soft filter on her whole body, and her midsection and legs look more like they've been drawn in PhotoShop to start with, as opposed to a massaged-photo.

Fee 02-09-2007 05:53 PM

Yeah, I have to agree. A lot of photo editing, and it wasn't even good photo editing. Overkill.

Feņa14 02-09-2007 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeOne (Post 1240887)
To ad to f_t_s's comments, that pic is one of the most over-processed, over-photoshopped, over-airbrushed pics of a 'real person' I've ever seen. There's a soft filter on her whole body, and her midsection and legs look more like they've been drawn in PhotoShop to start with, as opposed to a massaged-photo.

lol it's actually pretty funny how much that picture has been edited. When I opened the link the picture was just of the body and it looked so fake. I hope the editing team who did that photo get payed for all the over time they must of had to put in to get it looking like that!

What's going on with the mighty Australia aswell! England winning back to back matches and beating New Zealand, all in the form of the game that we could barely get a win against Bangladesh in .. Funny game eh? ;)


Quote:

Originally Posted by CanadianChic (Post 1240793)
Exellent post Fena - you just backed up my stance 100 percent.

I voted that she is under par - but not unattractive.

Yeah she's not totally unattractive, looks wise she isn't the best but if she had a great personality then she would appear more attractive. The fact that she doesn't have the greatest personality means I seem to notice her flaws more than I would otherwise.

Lakoste 02-09-2007 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maverick66 (Post 1240964)
then post that pic and say thats my type of girl was a cheap shot deny it all you want. it was. so once again WTH.

How is that a cheap shot? That's like posting a picture of [insert hot chick's name] and calling that a cheap shot. Maybe you found the girl in the picture to be unattractive, that doesn't mean everyone does.


EDIT:I think I figured out why you found the picture to be a cheap shot, with the username Maverick and all.....sorry about that....

maverick66 02-09-2007 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lakoste (Post 1240984)
EDIT:I think I figured out why you found the picture to be a cheap shot, with the username Maverick and all.....sorry about that....

im not sure what that has to do with anything. how is my name associated with fat chicks.

Borat 02-09-2007 06:30 PM

Kournikova at marias age has her beat by long shot, but i dunno, those legs....

abenguyen 02-09-2007 06:39 PM

yea her butt and chest area could have a little work done but i mean she still is pretty.

dpfrazier 02-09-2007 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CanadianChic (Post 1240793)
Exellent post Fena - you just backed up my stance 100 percent.

I voted that she is under par - but not unattractive.

Yup - I'm sure she's attractive to a lot of people, just not to me...

Jet Rink 02-09-2007 07:55 PM

What cracks me up is the one guy who voted for the "dish rag" option...

Yeesh.

I picked the "extremely hot" option and ain't afraid to admit it.

Jet


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse