![]() |
Nadal and Record for fewest Grand Slam matches won as #5
After this year's Australian Open, Nadal will be ranked #5. Amazingly, he will have won only 1 match in his last three grand slams.
This has to be some kind of record. |
Oh, look another Nadal hate thread. Have you seen all the Nadal hate threads that are already on the main page? Why do you feel the need to start up yet another one? At least you're staying true to form, I'll give you that much.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you do think these are hate threads, then serves you right for all the gloating you *******s have been doing the past week with his imminent return. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I have not been gloating a d*mn thing. The only one who has been talking nonsense like that is ********* and his multiple personalities. It's not my fault that people like you fall for his schtick and keep giving him attention. He's not even a Nadal fan and is really a Fed fan in disguise. |
So it is settled. Clarky21 has multiple accounts. :mad:
And I can't wait for RolandGarros2013 to roll around, so McEnroeisanartist will have to deal with the heaps of Nadal records being broken at every turn. :-P |
Quote:
10+1 |
Quote:
that's how inconsistent goran was... :-? |
This record means Eff-all as the Nadal became the only tennis player in world history to have won 3 consecutive slams on 3 different surfaces (clay, grass, hard court) in 2010 calender year. Nadal skipping the AO13 is actually good thing because he can then focusing on winning 3 consecutive slams on 3 different surfaces (clay, grass, hard court) just as he did in 2010 calender year. When he accomplishes this feat again (he did it in 2010) he will become the ONLY tennis player in world history to have won 3 consecutive slams on 3 different surfaces (clay, grass, hard court) in a calender year TWICE. Rafael 'The Impossible' Nadal will once again SHOCK the tennis world and all the haters who have been saying he is finished just like they did in 2009.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
USO 2012 and AO 2013 ar not HIS last 2 slams because he didn't play them. If you use your method then amazing he's only PLAYED 2 matches. |
True, and some(***) are citing how amazing he's been in the last 10 grand slams, BAHAHAHAHA.
|
His last 3 slams would normally refer to the last 3 slams HE PLAYED. Indeed, how can one win a match when they don't play? (Is there a brain in the OP's head :confused:). So Nadal won 14 matches in his last 3 slams.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:36 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse