![]() |
RacquetTune way off?
I realize that RacquetTune isn't going to always be accurate, but my last string job had a difference of 9 lbs. Should I be worried? I'm using the default string factors also.
|
Me too
It was used good like 1-2 lbs different max It is going up 5-9 lbs ( poly &syn) |
Quote:
|
My mom has that on her Ipad, I snagged the iPad for a week while she was gone and tried it. I was not impressed by it, It would start off +/- 5 pounds by what I strung it at (I only used fresh strings to test it). And every time I hit the bed with a spoon it would start off fairly accurate, and with each hit the tension on the app would start to read higher and higher, by about a half a pound each hit. But still a very impressive app for all the features and the fact it used only tunes from the strings to get a fairly accurate gauge on the string tensions
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
By the way I have had large differences on strings that I didn't measure but usually only 1-2 lbs |
Quote:
|
Strung at 35 lbs, measured on RT at 33. Pretty accurate I think
|
Quote:
|
I use a calibrated drop weight stringer and my jobs always measure 7 pounds high. I used to have other people string my racquets whose RacquetTune measurements were about 6-10 pounds low. My intuition tells me that if you measure the string factors accurately, RacquetTune is more accurate than the stringers. Don't rely on the default string factors for accuracy. It's ok to use them if you are only concerned about measuring relative tension loss.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Nightfire: If you use a LO, the machine stops pulling when it reaches ref tension. The string, since it is under tension, starts to lose that same tension so that it no longer at the tension the machine locked out at. If using DW or CP, tension starts to be lost as soon as the string is clamped. Again, the string will lose tension to relieve stress. Mikeler is correct that strings will ultimately lose between 10 and 25% of the desired ref tension. The low end is prem gut and the high end is poly.
|
I've had no issues with RT as long as I have the data set right. It is extremely consistent and has helped my become more consistent in my stringing processes.
Right now RT is showing a reading of +/- .1 lb from job to job. It does read a littler higher than reference right off the stringer. I average 3-4% 24hr tension loss vs. right off stringer. Been using it now for over a year and anytime I've had issues it turned out to be user error. |
On my end, RT seems to be fairly accurate....or at least good enough.
Two Steam 99S strung to 59 with Gosen Polylon 16 (from TW....not sure what type of machine they use), measured 54 on RT when I received them and before play. That seems reasonable enough to me for a cheap poly that has settled out for 2-3 days after stringing. I used the Gosen Polylon string factor thats already included in the app. The same frames, after 5-6 sets of use, measure out around 44 on RT. On the next stringing job, I am going to take measurements more frequently to see how fast tension actually drops off (i.e. does it drop from 54 to 44 after just a few minutes of use and hang out there, or is it a slow progression downward and then a plateau at 44). |
Quote:
Look at the tension loss RSI reports for a wide variety of strings: http://www.racquetsportsindustry.com...ctor_2012.html |
Quote:
|
I think what charts like that show is that, the tensions we truly "like" are actually alot less than we think (i.e. if I say I "like" 59 lb with "X" string, I am really "liking" something far less as the stringbed is not at 59 lb for very long (if at all))?
|
Quote:
Oh, and Buford T Justice, "do the letters F.O. mean anything to you?" :) |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:01 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse