![]() |
Anybody here got an LTA ranking?
......................
|
Liam,
I was unofficially rated at 5.2 on the old scale by a LTA coach. For people state-side LTA 1.0 = USTA 7.0. |
I'm confused
If LTA 1.0 = USTA 7.0, and you are a LTA 5.2....
That means you are a USTA 36.4? I think I'm missing something here. |
Re: I'm confused
Quote:
Ace, The scale is numbered the other way. Basically Tim Henman is LTA 1.0, i.e. an ATP top 100 player(USTA 7.0 = top 100 pro?). In England we only have one LTA 1.0 player :shock: On the new LTA scale a 10.0 is a complete novice. The same as USTA 1.0? On the new scale My 5.2 translates to lower-medium club player. Probably 3.0-3.5 USTA. |
Quote:
The worst you can be is 10.2 followed by 10.1, 9.2, 9.1, 8.2, 8.1, 7.2, 7.1, 6.2, 6.1, 5.2, 5.1, 4.2, 4.1, 3.2, 3.1, 2.2, 2.1, 1.2 , 1.1 That is the lta rating scale from bottom to top:). |
The OP was referring to ranking not rating, I'm not sure if that was deliberate.
I'm rated 4.2 and ranked 137 open. Conversion chart here: http://www.itftennis.com/shared/medi...4_original.PDF LTA ratings are very inaccurate at 5.2 and below (to 10.2) for various reasons..... |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse