Will Nadal will 47 slams in his career or more, or not that that many?
 

I seee my Nadal winning 47 slams. He will plays the next 15 years and win every French Open to give him 17 there. He will 2 out of every 3 Auastralian Open, US Open, and Wimbledons to give him 10 of each. I think that makes 47, yeah 15 + 10+10 +10 =47. So will my Nadal win 47 slams in his career, or more, if you mean more vote yes. Wont he wint that on the other hand with 47 being too many. Vote your choice.

Sampras only won 14

Sampras had great competition. Even though I am a big Nadal fan I admit he plays a bunch of losers like Federer, Hewitt, Roddick, Safin, Nalbandian, peopel that just suck. The up and comers like the two french players, Berdych, Ancic, all suck too. That is not his fault, he is awesome too, how awesome he is and the lossers he plays again equals up to alot of titles.

Sampras also was not nearly as good with his groundstrokes, movements, fitness, or return of serve as my Nadal. Samprwas was a great player but Nadal is better at all baseline shots and just more endurance and fit an athlete.

Where have all the intelligent posts gone?
________
Vaporizer review

I think I'm gonna be sick

I think they died with turn of the century

LOL!!! You cannot be serious....

For those of you who think I am not being reasonable please explasin to me why. I see it that Nadal has the talent, worth ethic and mental toughness to play until 35 years old. That is another 15 years. He is so hard to even not be embarassed by and win sets against now on any surface, let alone win a whole match which is a miracle. He is also not nearly as great a player as he will be in 7 years or so. So why would winning all the French opens for the next 15 years, and 2 out of 3 at every Australian, Wimbledon, and U.S Open be unreasonable? Please explain if you think it is really crazy or something sine I dont understand why that would be.

15+10+10+10=45!!

uh 1st of all, berdych and ancic arent french...
2nd of all, ur nuts...

that's why you are not reasonable ,nadal girl!:mrgreen:

You forgot the two French Opens he already won

I said Bercyh, Ancic, AND the two French gusy. I forget their names, I think Monfiles and Gasquer, but I was talking about them seperately from Berdych and Ancic. Either way they all are loser and suck compared to my Nadal and will never beat him.

though..i believe..that he will win at least 55!he will surely play until 36!I mean..come on!loser Agassi managed to play until 36 and not super,sexy nadal??This is ridiculous!
I vote for 50 nadal girl!

:mrgreen:

Oh..yeah..forgot about the two french he already has..!!How could i?!?!:O

im a HUGE Rafa fan and I dont think Rafa can win a quarter of what you are asking... ( 1/4 of 47 is about 12)
he has 2 right now (french at the roland garros)
if he were to continue and win french EVERY year until he is thirty then he would have 11... but i doubt that will happen
to achieve 40+ you have to win every grand slam in 10 years ...

i was predicting.. 100 but hell make it 120

Therei s no reason for cute Rafal to stop at 30. There is no reason with his worth ethic, talent, heart, determination, and desire to not play until 35.

Look at that, almost half votes yes, obviously it is not unreasonable.

I agree with every part of that post. including the first sentence

Reckon so?no..120 are just too many..don't you think??
Ah..and don't forget..
HE MUST be given credit of the slams he didn't play in JUST because he happened to be injured..!!I mean...come on!