Quote:
Originally Posted by federerfanatic
I am not comparing Venus in her prime to Graf in her prime, which is meaningless to Graf's chances to win slam titles in 20002004. Graf in 20002004 would not have been in her "prime", she wasnt even in her prime by 1999, so that argument is is irrelevant.
I am comparing Venus of 20002003 to Venus of 1999, since you basicaly implied she was exactly the same which is nonsense. ....

In 200003 Graf was gone and Davenport & Hingis slumped or were injured most of the time. Take away all Graf/Davenport/Hingis matches and Venus has the same winning percentage in 1999 as in 2000/03.
Graf would not have dominated in 2000/04 but she would have won a slam here and there. 46 more slams in 5 years would have been easily possible.
Condi