View Single Post
Old 04-19-2007, 12:05 PM   #50
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,418

Originally Posted by suwanee4712 View Post
This is laughable. No offense to Jana, who was a wonderful player. But Hana would've beaten her every day all week and twice on Sunday. Not that you would care to know why. But it has everything to do with the fact that Hana was much more versatile in the backcourt, especially off the backhand side, including a topspin backhand that was as good as her slice backhand. Because of her largely absent topspin or flat backhand, Jana was too easily attackable. Which is why she had so little success against Martina who was well past her prime in the 90's.

You disgrace Steffi. ...
By telling the truth about Hana Mandlikova?
Please explain.

BTW, Mandlikova won 514 and lost 181 matches.
Novotna was 526-208.
Almost the same - but Jana didn't play in an era where Jaeger and Shriver types could get to #3 and #4 ....

Condoleezza is offline   Reply With Quote