Originally Posted by BreakPoint
BTW, why is it that whenever Federer loses a couple of matches, everyone blames his racquet. But when any other pro loses a couple of matches, nobody blames their racquets?
Likewise, when Federer wins 3 Grand Slams in a year and over 80 matches, nobody gives his racquet any credit?
Because when any other pro loses a couple of matches, no one talks about it at all, let alone his racquets.
Because Wilson made such a big deal about Federer and the K90, which was much bigger hype than Nadal and the APD.
Because no other pro uses the K90, one other uses a 90, leading to the suspicion that Fed was winning inspite of his racquet.