Originally Posted by skip1969
WORD! all fed REALLY cares about at this point are the slams. he's thinking about his spot in the hall of fame. if you asked him where he would have preferred losing this year, in melbourne or in monte carlo/rome/hamburg . . . i think he'd opt for the clay court strike out and keep his aussie slam. tomorrow's match doesn't mean squat, other than to shut everyone up about the friggin' clay court streak and the losses to nadal.
why'd nadal play hamburg, anyway? i hope we're not gonna start hearing the 'nadal is worn out from winning everything on clay' excuses.
So it seems that if Federer loses itīs not important and if he wins it means something. I get the idea