View Single Post
Old 07-27-2008, 09:35 AM   #46
crazylevity
Hall Of Fame
 
crazylevity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,978
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chess9 View Post
Kids might benefit from a smaller headed, head light racquet in the 11-13 oz range. I'm not sure it has to be wood. But, I'd like to hear from the top coaches on this issue. Guys like Yandell, Bolletieri (he'd probably oppose it), Van der meer, etc.

Have the lighter, bigger, more powerful racquets brought more kids into tennis? Actually, I don't think that's the case. The 70's were huge for tennis, but now you have to watch the AO at 2 a.m. in the States. American tennis is not on the ropes, but we aren't experiencing a Renaissance. Neither is Australia or England, two of the historically strong tennis powers. Of course, you can't be 300 lbs and play tennis, and all three countries are facing varying degrees of fitness erosion.
My personal view is that kids enjoy a challenge just as much as adults do, so they might benefit from both the old technology and the new, integrated into a comprehensive training program. You want them disciplined enough to be able to hit with a small racquet head, but they need to compete with the best modern equipment, especially strings.

-Robert
Indeed. Australia and the US are number 1 and 2 in the world in obesity rates, I believe. Are we expecting tennis champions to be bursting at the seams in these places, then?
__________________
Microgel Prestige Pro, Big Banger Original 58lbs
adidas Barricade IV
crazylevity is offline   Reply With Quote