Originally Posted by officerdibble
I can't speak for US law, but your point doesn't hold in the UK. What are the laws on misleading shareholders in the US? Head claimed that there innovative technology was so good it helped Andre Agassi reach a Grand Slam final!
I don't think most Head shareholders care what technology Agassi used to get to a Grand Slam final. What they care about is how many racquets Head can sell. And if paintjobs help Head to sell more racquets, then its shareholders would LOVE paintjobs.