Thread: Eagnas?!!!!
View Single Post
Old 09-14-2008, 11:32 AM   #24
lawlitssoo1n
Professional
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,471
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mellofelow View Post
My experience with the 940 is that the base plate is not rigid enough and it does flex under tension. And I have test and proved it using digital scale. I promptly exchanged it for the 910.

http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=51706

I can't believe it's been almost 3 years. Although the 910 has served me well, the maintenance aspect of ownership leaves much to be desired.

Come this Wednesday a new GAMMA will be in the house. Between the 3 machines I own, I can't wait to sell Eagnas fast enough. And yes, the Ektelon will remain the backup. Here's the history of my machine ownership.

Tremont - 2 yrs
Ektelon - 20+ and counting
Eagnas Combo 910 - 3 yrs
Gamma ST-II - new beginning...
hm.. i see
but the 910 base is plastic, should't it flex more? cuz i string my racket at 65-70lbs. well maybe the 940 metal base is very thin? I'm guessing
lawlitssoo1n is offline   Reply With Quote