Originally Posted by jamesblakefan#1
Fed's won 3 of the 4 slams in 3 different years (2004, 2006, 2007). Why would this year be any different, and you "might" reconsider your stance? What a joke. He has been dominant, he had one of the most dominant seasons of all time in 2006, and was only 2 sets from the Grand Slam that season. I don't know what more Federer has to do for some folks to give him credit....if 15 slams, 22 straight slam SF, and 237 straight weeks at #1 isn't dominant enough, I don't know what is...
And we've already exposed the flaws in all the weak/strong era talk, so gimme a break.
Oh come now. You know that if Korda was playing in this era he would totally dominate the field. I'd put Kucera, Schaller, Philippoussis, and Yzaga right up there with Korda as well.