Originally Posted by jackson vile
Don't be a fool, only reason Roger won was because Nadal was not there. Fact is that is the only way Roger was ever going to win the FO.
As for being blind you must be the blind one as Roger never has and never will defeat Nadal at the FO end of story.
That is quite undeniable. There is absolutely no way Fed would have beaten Rafa in a best of 5 on clay (it's already eminently debatable whether he could beat Rafa in a best of 5 on other surfaces, much less on clay)