View Single Post
Old 09-27-2009, 06:29 PM   #40
Hall Of Fame
drwood's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,512

Originally Posted by Azzurri View Post
so now you are comparing two different sports??? maybe you would not know this, but tennis and basketball are different sports...UNLIKE Pete, MJ needed a multitude of other players to win 6 titles..but Pete needed just himself to win 14. again, another clueless post.
Pete just needed himself? Right. That's why he never did anything on grass until Gullickson taught him how to return serve on grass. Try again.

Basketball and tennis are two different sports -- however in his sport MJ is unquestionably the GOAT. There are clear reasons to argue against Pete in tennis -- most glaringly his average (for a GOAT candidate) record on clay. Not so for MJ...he had no weaknesses in his sport.

MJ is clearly a much bigger jerk than Sampras, but Sampras could be a jerk as well, especially when he was losing.

I respect Sampras' career and loved his game -- I never thought his game was boring at all -- a dominant serve is a beautiful thing to watch.
"I thank the Lord Jesus Christ, because without Him, I am nothing." -- Michael Chang after beating Stefan Edberg to win the 1989 French Open
drwood is offline   Reply With Quote