View Single Post
Old 10-03-2009, 08:46 AM   #224
abmk
G.O.A.T.
 
abmk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: India
Posts: 14,406
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jackson vile View Post
So Roger lost 2 more sets in slams in 2009 than 2008, the point is proven even more.
no of sets lost isn't really conclusive evidence of anything.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jackson vile View Post
Further Roger played more in 2008 when he was supposedly sick.
uh, he's had problems this year too >> he missed dubai and DC ( in the early part of the season ) due to backache

plus the difference in the no of matches is increased due to olympics ( not there this year ) and halle ( which he did not play because of the gruelling matches he had to play at the FO >> and you saying it was a gimme shows how clueless you are and how much you follow the game )

Quote:
Originally Posted by jackson vile View Post
At best 2008 and 2009 are the same, Roger apeared in finals just the same etc.Let me know when Roger does not make finals in slams then you can talk about a bad year for Roger LOL
I thought we were talking about federer in 2008 and 2009 and not with comparision to others. By normal standards >> 2008 was a good year ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by jackson vile View Post
FO is a gimme,
^Refer to above

Quote:
Originally Posted by jackson vile View Post
you defining a good year and a bad year with 2 masters is lame at best especially when he is dropoing more sets in slams when he is supposed to be 100% health.
Refer to reply in part2 regarding "health" ...
abmk is offline   Reply With Quote