Originally Posted by matchmaker
For me this is a no brainer: Stich had the best game of the three mentioned.
He was truly an all courter, all surface player.
Much more versatile than the other two IMO.
They were all effective on all surfaces. All won titles on indoors, grass, clay and hardcourt. All advanced to quarters and semis at every slam, often multiple times. One could argue Stich as more versatile, but I think it is unclear. Again, they all were dangerous on all surfaces.
Titles by Surface:Ivanisevic
Titles by Surface: Stich
Titles by surface: Krajicek
Pretty decent mix from all. Factor in runner-up finishes and doubles titles, and it becomes even more diverse. I do not believe anyone should say Stich was "far more" versatile.