View Single Post
Old 10-31-2009, 05:36 AM   #16
hoodjem's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bierlandt
Posts: 11,806

1977 is a very tough year to call, one of the toughest. Lots of debate on here about it. I originally had Vilas as no. 1, but have been persuaded that Borg deserves also an equal rating (Borg 3-0 against Vilas that year). Connors did win the WCT Finals and the Masters, but why the heck did the ATP computer rank Connors as no. 1?

Question: in what part of the year did Gonzales retire in 1960?

I remain convinced that in 1964 Laver was marginally better than Kenny: all the stats point in this direction. The case for Ashe higher than Connors in 1975 does seem strong. I bow to consensus. Edit made on 1978: Borg alone.

Agassi looks like a very close no. 2 in 1995, but not quite. In 1999 Sampras looks like a very close no. 2, but not quite.
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure, while the intelligent are full of doubt.

Last edited by hoodjem : 07-07-2010 at 04:50 AM.
hoodjem is offline   Reply With Quote