View Single Post
Old 11-01-2009, 04:40 PM   #25
CyBorg
Legend
 
CyBorg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 5,507
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by timnz View Post
In Wikipedia it states"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_n...layer_rankings


against 1964


McCauley's 1964 chapter is entitled: Rosewall Tops Again But Only Just[27] but Robert Geist co-ranked Laver & Rosewall #1 (in his book "DER GRÖSSTE MEISTER Die denkwürdige Karriere des australischen Tennisspielers Kenneth Robert Rosewall").

What is McCauley's or Geist's logic here to consider Rosewall Number 1 or co-number 1? It seems that Laver is ahead in every category of consideration. Why do they think Rosewall was the best that year?
I've just re-read the chapter and honestly McCauley's logic is ambiguous. He really doesn't make much of an argument for Rosewall, nor attempts one.

That said, I see nothing wrong with Rosewall being considered the co-#1 that year. He did win the French Pro and the battles with Laver at the US and Wembley pros were close. Still the h2h is hard to overlook.
CyBorg is offline   Reply With Quote