Originally Posted by samprasvsfederer123
federer only had nadal to stop him
, sampras had a much harder time, federer might be the better overall player
cause he could do something good in clay but when these two face each others' strengths like grass, or hard court no matter the speed of the courts i think sampras would win. sampras could have a dazzling game even without serve and volleying.
you just stated he's a better player. haha
nadal being the only person to stop him doesn't mean he had it easy. so he had to be stopped by many more players to be closer to goat? doesn't that mean you loose more games? federer just makes everything looks easy.
im not saying pete sucks or anything. i think he has the best serves ever but both at their prime, federer is the victor. by far everything here is too subjective, but it makes it fun.