LOL, some just don't see the big picture. Everyone knows Fed would own Pete on clay. But on nay other surface Pete would have a better h2h. NOT because of skill either but because Pete possessed a stronger mental game. Fed looks flashier and plays in an era with garbage (except Nadal) competition (many freely admit they are defeated even before getting into the ring with this guy) with slower courts. Don't get me wrong, I think the two are neck and neck and some days I think Fed is the best and others Pete is. But everytime I read some of the ridiculous reasons the teenagers give on these threads, I pick PETE!
"I may come across as a Pete-hater, but I'm not. I have utmost respect for his abilities" Fed_Rulz 2011