View Single Post
Old 11-19-2009, 05:31 AM   #18
lambielspins's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,715

Originally Posted by samprasvsfederer123 View Post

federer only had nadal to stop him, sampras had a much harder time, federer might be the better overall player cause he could do something good in clay but when these two face each others' strengths like grass, or hard court no matter the speed of the courts i think sampras would win. sampras could have a dazzling game even without serve and volleying.
So says the poster who believes Roddick playing the same tennis he couldnt beat a 34 year old Agassi with would destroy Federer and the other top players of today:
lambielspins is offline   Reply With Quote