^^^You got me.? Here's the OP:
Originally Posted by samprasvsfederer123
federer only had nadal to stop him, sampras had a much harder time, federer might be the better overall player cause he could do something good in clay but when these two face each others' strengths like grass, or hard court no matter the speed of the courts i think sampras would win. sampras could have a dazzling game even without serve and volleying.
In the end, the aggressive all-court player always has the advantage against a power-bashing baseliner.