View Single Post
Old 01-03-2010, 12:42 PM   #16
hoodjem
G.O.A.T.
 
hoodjem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bierlandt
Posts: 11,577
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by krosero View Post
Laver had an excellent forehand but his backhand was deadlier, and it's hard to see how his FH could go over other guys who were known for their forehands, .
Kros,
I don't disagree but simply offer a different interpretation of Laver's forehand. Yes, the backhand may have been deadlier, but that doesn't make the forehand weaker, only by comparison was it less feared. I regard Laver's forehand as similar to Nadal's: huge lefty power, flat drive or lots of topspin, deep to the corners when wanted or sharply angled when necessary.
__________________
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure, while the intelligent are full of doubt.
hoodjem is offline   Reply With Quote