View Single Post
Old 02-10-2010, 12:08 PM   #23
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 9,252

Originally Posted by hoodjem View Post
Some excellent points here.

Today's media and public are far more focused on total number of slams than they were back in 1970.

After all (and I've said this before), how many persons were calling Emmo "the GOAT" back in 1970 because he had the highest total number of slams?

Answer: none.
That's why the stuff about the majors, while important is perhaps bit overrated. What's more impressive, winning 5 top tier tournaments that aren't majors but have the best field or one major? I would think the former.

Federer has under 70 tournament victories in his career. Somehow I think accomplishments like Connors and Lendl being in the 140's plus a number of majors should count for something. It amazes me that in the Open Era, virtually every top number one has been called the GOAT by many at one point or another except for Lendl. I think it had a lot to do with the fact Lendl was not liked by the media.

Last edited by pc1; 02-11-2010 at 12:29 PM.
pc1 is offline   Reply With Quote