View Single Post
Old 03-10-2010, 07:57 AM   #7
coyfish
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,621
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KaZe View Post
The 2.3's sound not too bad right about now. Too bad the weight of the shoe isn't lighter...i wanted something very maneuverable..but then again you can't have the perfect shoe...light and comfortable. The negatives of the 2.3's are probably the worst negatives to have haha.

How are the Asics in general on the court? I've never realy heard about their performance other than for running and track and field and such.
Well I am a triathlete. So I run miles with VERY light racer shoes. And I was coming from asics gel res II's which were light for a tennis shoe. The Nike's didn't feel overly heavy or cumbresome at all. I wore my dads addidas barricades and my god. Those things were like strapping bricks to your feet.

The asics are great shoes. Take a little while to breakin but other than the low durability . . . they only get positive reviews.

The Nike's are definately my favorite shoe to date though. Look great, were cheap, and feel the best.
coyfish is offline   Reply With Quote