Originally Posted by mandy01
Anyone who follows Roger knows his interviews with Courier aren't serious.And this is further evidenced by the fact that Roger was already there on court when the the umpire called time.And AGAIN where exactly this lovely admission came,you have still not shown us..
I've never heard of this, Roger's interviews with Courier aren't serious. I don't believe that. We only have what he said we can't analyze their motives. That's actually the problem with this whole accusatory thing. No one knows whether Rafa was hurt or not, yet many declare him a cheater. Ironically, Fed admits to gamesmanship, but he wasn't serious.
It was an interview after the match. More than one person saw it as it was telecast worldwide. Everyone knows he said it, if he hadn't you couldn't say he wasn't serious. You've actually proved he did say it, by saying he didn't mean it. So, why would I need more proof?