Originally Posted by Cindysphinx
My husband is a big fan of the Tour. He makes the arguments that Orange One makes about doping.
What makes me think Armstrong is doping? Well, it is an endurance sport. When I think about endurance sports (say, marathons), it is rare for someone to dominate year after year. Has anyone ever won a marathon seven years in a row?
Does anyone really believe Armstrong could beat opponents who were doping if he didn't also dope?
Considering he tested positive in samples from '99 for EPO, along with countless eye-witness accounts of his PED usage, I'd say there's at least a 90% chance he was dirty. Even though the case was thrown out, I still think its probably legitimate.