View Single Post
Old 07-08-2010, 11:36 AM   #9
lisp
New User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 35
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BreakPoint View Post
So why is that it 99% of the pros that use racquets bigger than 90 sq. in. have never won even a single Slam?

And if 5 more square inches = 5 more Slams, why wouldn't 50 more square inches = 50 more Slams?
Federer should soooo change to a Gamma Big Bubba 29 he'd win so many more slams with that.
__________________
WTB Head Prestige IG MID x 1
lisp is offline   Reply With Quote