Originally Posted by BreakPoint
So why is that it 99% of the pros that use racquets bigger than 90 sq. in. have never won even a single Slam?
And if 5 more square inches = 5 more Slams, why wouldn't 50 more square inches = 50 more Slams?
Federer should soooo change to a Gamma Big Bubba 29 he'd win so many more slams with that.