View Single Post
Old 12-06-2005, 11:40 AM   #26
FiveO
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,261
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaptain Karl
This idea is growing on me, but let me be sure I understand your ... coding.

Are you suggesting that since players usually have a *primary* style ... accompanied by differing "supportive" styles ... we could actually code their styles accordingly? (If so, Sampras is the perfect choice for this -- as I agree with you, he doesn't "fit" the (too commonly afixed) label "All Courter.") To decipher your coding of Sampras' game...

Sampras: big server/s & v/net attacker... This describes Pete's primary style. But he also employed the big fh baseliner tactics ... on a secondary level.

Is this what you meant?

I also agree with all of the following....
Federer: All-Courter

Federer has caused me to re-think Sampras as a pure all-courter. Sampras was never willing to play defense and retrieve like Federer or Rafter and almost never drew opponents forward with short balls or drop-shots as Fed does regularly. While Sampras was more all-court than his contemporaries and predecessors, Federer simply utilizes more elements in his game than Pete did.

Yes. Federer is the "model" of the All Courter, IMO.

Agreed ... I think. Do I accurately grasp your intent, above?

And, friends, I'd really like to keep this to current players. Of course we "old timers" can easily categorize Borg, Smith, Newk, Evert, King, etc. ... but if this methodology is to become useful, it must appeal and apply to the "modern" styles of play.

- KK
Exactly my friend.
FiveO is offline   Reply With Quote