Originally Posted by BreakPoint
........but nobody ever says that his opponent needs a SMALLER racquet whenever they lose to Federer?
And a lot more people lose to Federer than beat Federer.
I mean, isn't the rationale here that the winner is using the superior racquet while the loser is using the inferior racquet?
it's not that... just the question if he is so good with 90in how would he play with 95 (if we all know how easier it is to hit with 5in bigger frame)... and it leaves us speechless to even imagine how good he can be
but maybe it's stupid thinking and can lead to even worse game...