View Single Post
Old 05-19-2011, 06:19 AM   #10
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,944

Originally Posted by bluetrain4 View Post
I don't think "park board" types would deny it's a great surface. The issue is usually with cost, actual or perceived, of the courts and the cost of maintenance.
From what I've learned at our club, the initial cost of installation is higher for Har-Tru, but ongoing costs are actually lower with proper maintenance, which really isn't hard. As I said, many of the community swim and racket clubs here in the east have them and membership fees to these places are not high - no rich country club folks here, but middle-class suburbanites.

For a public park, hard courts are just more convenient - lower upfront costs and resurface and replace nets every few years as needed (or when they literally fall apart as we've all seen). No regular maintenance needed. I don't think I've seen "public" Har-Tru courts.
"More Sureshs, less Maxima for a better TT." - Power Player
BMC9670 is offline