Originally Posted by TMF
I can also easily say Fed could have won multiple CYGS had there was an oppotunity for him to compete only on grass and hard court.
I think we should just hold on to what players have actually accomplished and stop adding(or subtracting) their wins by assuming if this and that had occurred.
All we know is winning slam on 3 difference surfaces is harder than 2 surfaces. Ok?
I only proffered what Laver actually accomplished - he won more of the most important events in the world in his day, on many more surfaces, than anyone else ever did, including Fetherer.