[Datacipher]

Originally Posted by TMF

I can also easily say Fed could have won multiple CYGS had there was an oppotunity for him to compete only on grass and hard court.

I think we should just hold on to what players have actually accomplished and stop adding(or subtracting) their wins by assuming if this and that had occurred.

How this line of reasoning started:

Originally Posted by TMF

I always refer to Laver as a 11 slam winners. However, i believe his accomplishments has less weight than the modern era. That's include only conquered on 2 surfaces and the field lacks the depth/talent.

Hypocrite. Fine not taking or adding anything: Laver = 2 grand slams. Federer = ZERO.