Originally Posted by travlerajm
This is all as expected. But all of your observations are due to impact dynamics (as distinct from swing dynamics).
(2) is more polarized than (1), with lower ACOR (which correlates with serve speed) and higher recoil weight (which correlates with depth control on volleys). The fact that the impact point is farther from the balance point makes for longer dwell time, which makes it spinnier and more arm friendly.
Ah, I see. Thanks for the explanation. Just one question and sorry to derail:
How important is it to have a MR^2 > 380? I can't seem to find a spec on this frame that will get me over ~376 and without adding more lead to the 3/9 positions than i want to.