Originally Posted by NadalAgassi
I would agree with this but for one problem. If Miami is such a good surface for Nadal, why has Nadal never won it.
Well maybe it's not such a good surface in general for Nadal but a good one in his specific match-up with Fed? Similar as Cincy is the best surface possible for him to play Nadal despite the fact that he never won Cincy either.
It is strange to me however, looking at Nadal's succes on clay and his playing style in general you'd expect Miami would be the first masters tourney he'd win aside from CC masters. I mean no way would I predict Nadal would have won an indoor HC masters like Madrid so early in his career but still not to this day bag a Miami title.